Volume 8 | Issue 3 | September-December 2022 | Page: 06-10| Selema B. Bob-Manuel, Richard C. Echem, Somiari L. Harcourt
Authors: Selema B. Bob-Manuel FWACS (Ortho) , Richard C. Echem FWACS (Ortho) , Somiari L. Harcourt FMCS (Ortho) 
 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria.
Address of Correspondence
Dr. Bob-Manuel Selema Benibo
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria.
Background: Scoring systems are being employed in the objective assessment of the severity of idiopathic clubfoot deformities . Popular among these scoring systems are the Diméglio and Pirani Scoring Systems. This study aims to find the correlation of idiopathic club foot scores (Pirani and Diméglio) with the number of castings by Ponseti method.
Methodology: It was a prospective study carried out over a 12-month period in a tertiary hospital. Children with idiopathic congenital talipes equinovarus under 3 years were included in the study. All data was analysed with the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20 for Windows. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to determine the correlation between clubfoot scores and number of castings done.
Results: The study comprised of 42 subjects with a total of 58 feet . Male and females were 45.2% (19) and 54.8% (23) respectively. Idiopathic clubfoot was unilateral in 61.9% of cases. The mean Pirani and Diméglio scores at presentation were 4.58± 1.42 and 14.28± 3.37 respectively. The mean number of casting sessions required to achieve correction was 4.00±1.19. There was a significant positive correlation between total number of castings with both Pirani scores (r=0.449, p<0.05) and Diméglio scores (r=0.619, p<0.05). Fifty percent (50%) of feet required percutaneous tenotomy in the final stages of correction.
Conclusion: Pirani and Diméglio scores have significant correlation with number of casts a patient will require for correction. Thus, either of these scores can be used and are useful tools in the monitoring of patients’ treatment with Ponseti method.
Keywords: Idiopathic Clubfoot, Ponseti, Pirani Score, Diméglio Score, Manipulation and casting.
1. Omololu B, Ogunlade SO, Alonge TO. Pattern of congenital orthopaedic malformations in an African teaching hospital. West Afr J Med. 2005;24(2):92–5.
2. Orimolade EA, Ikem IC, Akinyoola AL, Adegbehingbe OO, Oginni LM, Esan O. Pattern of Congenital Musculoskeletal Abnormalities in South West, Nigeria: A Hospital Based Study. Niger J Orthop Trauma. 2013;12(1):52–5.
3. Staheli L. Clubfoot: Ponseti Management. 3rd ed. Global Help; 2009. Available from: https://storage.googleapis.com/global-help-cdn/2020/07/5e0684b9-help_cfponseti.pdf
4. Ponseti I V. Congenital Clubfoot: Fundamentals of treatment. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996.
5. Matos MA, de Oliveira LAA. Comparison between Ponseti’s and Kite’s clubfoot treatment methods: a meta-analysis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2010;49(4):395–7.
6. Segev E, Keret D, Lokiec F, Yavor A, Wientroub S, Ezra E, et al. Early experience with the Ponseti method for the treatment of congenital idiopathic clubfoot. Isr Med Assoc J. 2005;7(5):307–10.
7. Gao R, Tomlinson M, Walker C. Correlation of Pirani and Dimeglio scores with number of Ponseti casts required for clubfoot correction. J Pediatr Orthop. 2014;34(6):639–42.
8. Dyer PJ, Davis N. The role of the Pirani scoring system in the management of club foot by the Ponseti method. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(8):1082–4.
9. Diméglio A, Bensahel H, Souchet P, Mazeau P, Bonnet F. Classification of clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop B. 1995;4(2):129–36.
10. Mejabi JO, Esan O, Adegbehingbe OO, Orimolade EA, Asuquo J, Badmus HD, Anipole AO. The Pirani scoring system is effective in assessing severity and monitoring treatment of clubfeet in children. Br J Med Med Res. 2016;17(4):1-9.
11. Cosma D, Vasilescu DE. A Clinical Evaluation of the Pirani and Dimeglio Idiopathic Clubfoot Classifications. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015;54(4):582–5.
12. Adegbehingbe OO, Oginni LM, Ogundele OJ, Ariyibi AL, Abiola PO, Ojo OD. Ponseti clubfoot management: changing surgical trends in Nigeria. Iowa Orthop J. 2010;30:7–14.
13. Sanghvi A V., Mittal VK. Conservative management of idiopathic clubfoot: Kite versus Ponseti method. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2009;17(1):67–71.
14. Boakye H, Nsiah A, Thomas A, Bello A. Treatment Outcome of Ponseti Method in the Management of Club Foot at Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Ghana: A Retrospective Study. Arch Curr Res Int. 2016;3(2):1–8.
15. Morcuende JA, Dolan LA, Dietz FR, Ponseti I V. Radical reduction in the rate of extensive corrective surgery for clubfoot using the Ponseti method. Pediatrics. 2004;113(2):376–80.
16. Agarwal A, Gupta N. Does initial Pirani score and age influence number of Ponseti casts in children? Int Orthop. 2014;38(3):569–72.
17. Jowett CR, Morcuende JA, Ramachandran M. Management of congenital talipes equinovarus using the Ponseti method: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(9):1160–4.
18. Barker SL, Lavy CBD. Correlation of clinical and ultrasonographic findings after Achilles tenotomy in idiopathic club foot. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(3):377–9.
19. Scher DM, Feldman DS, van Bosse HJP, Sala DA, Lehman WB. Predicting the need for tenotomy in the Ponseti method for correction of clubfeet. J Pediatr Orthop. 2004;24(4):349–52.
20. Lampasi M, Trisolino G, Abati CN, Bosco A, Marchesini Reggiani L, Racano C, et al. Evolution of clubfoot deformity and muscle abnormality in the Ponseti method: evaluation with the Dimeglio score. Int Orthop. 2016;40(10):2199–205.
|How to Cite this Article: Bob-Manuel SB, Echem RC, Harcourt SL | Correlation of Idiopathic Clubfoot Scores with Number of Manipulations and Castings Using Ponseti Method: A Prospective Study in Port Harcourt, Nigeria | International Journal of Paediatric Orthopaedics | September-December 2022; 8(3): 06-10. https://doi.org/10.13107/ijpo.2022.v08.i03.143|