Lever Arm dysfunction of Hips in Cerebral Palsy

Volume 10 | Issue 1 | January-April 2024 | Page: 14-19 | Jitendra Kumar Jain

DOI- https://doi.org/10.13107/ijpo.2024.v10i01.173

Submitted: 14/01/2024; Reviewed: 10/02/2024; Accepted: 06/03/2024; Published: 10/04/2024


Authors: Jitendra Kumar Jain MS Ortho [1]

[1] Trishla Foundation, Tagore Town, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Address of Correspondence

Dr. Jitendra Kumar Jain,
Chairman, Trishla Foundation, Tagore Town, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, India.
E-mail: jjain999@gmail.com


Abstract

In cerebral palsy, hip dysfunction is the second most common problem after equines deformity. Abnormal skeletal development of the proximal femur due to abnormal forces in cerebral palsy leads to lever arm function by reducing the length of the lever arm contributing to one of very important causes of gait abnormality. High hip anteversion, high neck shaft angle, subluxation, and dislocation are the most common lever arm dysfunctions at the hip joint. This lever arm dysfunction increases progressively with age and correspondence to GMFCS level. If not identified at a very early stage then it may progress to completely deform the femoral head & hip joint. Early identification and preventive surgery help in preventing progression in GMFCS I to III but can progress despite of preventive surgery in non-walker children FMFCS IV & V. Recurrence of the problem is also very common in non-walker children. So we need detailed information about the lever arm problem in the hip and how to deal with this problem in cerebral palsy children. In this article, we have discussed etiology, and how to identify and management protocols for different lever arm dysfunctions of the hip in cerebral palsy.
Keywords: Cerebral palsy, Lever arm dysfunction of hip, Hip subluxation, Anteversion


References

1. Peterson N, Walton R. Ambulant cerebral palsy. J. Orthop. Trauma 2016; 30 (6 ): 525-38.
2. Gage JR, Schwartz MH. Consequences of brain injury on musculoskeletal development. In; Gage JR, Schwartz MH, Koop SE, Novacheck TF (ed). The identification and treatment of gait problem in cerebral palsy. Mac Keith Press: 2nd edition; 2009. p. 107-29
3. Theologis T. Lever arm dysfunction in cerebral palsy gait-CURRENT CONCEPT REVIEW. J Child Orthop 2013; 7:379–92.
4. Robin J, Graham H K, Selber P, Dobson F, Smith K, Baker R. Proximal femoral geometry in cerebral palsy: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2008; 90-B: 1372-79.
5. Ounpuu S, Solomito M, Bell K, Pierz K. Long-term outcomes of external femoral derotation osteotomy in children with cerebral palsy. Gait Posture 2017; 56: 82-8.
6. Root L. Surgical treatment for hip pain in the adult cerebral palsy patient. Dev Med Child Neurol, 2009; 51 (Suppl. 4): 84–91.
7. Goldschmidt RB. Instability of the hip in cerebral palsy. Curr. Orthop. 1998; 12: 40-50.
8. Soo B, Howard JJ, Boyd RN, Reid SM, Lanigan A, Wolfe R, Reddihough D, Graham K. Hip Displacement in Cerebral Palsy. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2006; 88-A: 121-9.
9. Bowena RE and Kehl DK. Radiographic outcome of soft-tissue surgery for hip subluxation in non-ambulatory children with cerebral palsy. J Pediatr Orthop 2006; 15 (2):109–12.
10. Robb JE, Hagglund G. Hip surveillance and management of the displaced hip in cerebral palsy. J Child Orthop 2013; 7:407–13.
11. Min JJ, Kwon SS, Sung KH, Lee KM, Chung CY, Park MS. Remodeling of femoral head deformity after hip reconstructive surgery in patients with cerebral palsy. J Bone Joint 2021; 103 B(1):198–203.
12. Hagglund G, Lauge-Pedersen H, Persson M. Radiographic threshold values for hip screening in cerebral palsy. J Child Orthop 2007: 1:43–7.
13. Fernandez-Palazzi F, Carpio A. Adductor Myotomy in Cerebral Palsy: Uni or Bilateral. J Child Orthop 2008; 2:225–7.
14. Shore BJ, Yu X, Desai S, Selber P, Wolfe R, Graham HK. Adductor Surgery to Prevent Hip Displacement in Children with Cerebral Palsy: The Predictive Role of the Gross Motor Function Classification System. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2012; 94:326-34.
15. Presedo A, Oh CW, Dabney KW, Miller F. Soft-Tissue Releases to Treat Spastic Hip Subluxation in Children with Cerebral Palsy. J Bone Joint Surg 2005; 87-A (4): 832-41.
16. Hsieh HC, Wang TM, Kuo KN, Huang SC, Wu KW. Guided Growth Improves Coxa Valga and Hip Subluxation in Children with Cerebral Palsy. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2019) 477:2568-76.
17. Davids JR. Proximal Femur Guided Growth for the Management of Hip Dysplasia in Children with Cerebral Palsy. J Pediatr Orthop B 2021; 3 (2):1-7.
18. Huh K, Rethlefsen SA, Wren TAL, Kay RM. Surgical Management of Hip Subluxation and Dislocation in Children with Cerebral Palsy: Isolated VDRO or Combined Surgery? J Pediatr Orthop 2011; 31(8): 858:63.
19. Root L, Laplaza FJ, Brourman SN, Angel DH. The severely unstable hip in cerebral palsy. Treatment with open reduction, pelvic osteotomy, and femoral osteotomy with shortening. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1995; 77:703-12.
20. Shore BJ, Zurakowaski D, Dufreny C, Powell D, Matheney TH, Snyder BD. Proximal femoral varus derotation osteotomy in children with cerebral palsy: The effect of age, gross motor function classification system level & surgeon volume on surgical success. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2015; 97:2024-31.
21. Pirpiris M, Trivett A, Baker R, Rodda J, Nattrass GR, Graham HK. Femoral derotation osteotomy in spastic diplegia proximal or distal? J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2003;85-B:265-72.
22. Hosseinzadeh P, Baldwin K, Minaie A, Miller F. Management of Hip Disorders in Patients with Cerebral Palsy. J Bone Joint Surg 2020;8(3): e0148 •
23. Mazur JM, Danko AM, Standard SC, Loveless EA, Cummings RJ. Remodeling of the proximal femur after varus osteotomy in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 2004; 46: 412–5.
24. Davids JR. Management of Neuromuscular Hip Dysplasia in Children with Cerebral Palsy: Lessons and Challenges. J Pediatr Orthop 2018; 38 (6) Supplement 1:21-7.
25. Reidy K, Heidt C, Dierauer S, Huber H. A balanced approach for stable hips in children with cerebral palsy: a combination of moderate VDRO and pelvic osteotomy. J Child Orthop (2016); 10:281–8.
26. Mubarak SJ, Valencia FG, and Wenger DR. One-Stage Correction of the Spastic Dislocated Hip: use of pericapsular acetabuloplasty to improve coverage. J Bone Joint Surg. 1992; 74-A (9): 1347-57.
27. Canavese F, Emara K, Sembrano JN, Bialik V, Aiona MD, Sussman MD. Varus Derotation Osteotomy for the Treatment of Hip Subluxation and Dislocation in GMFCS Level III to V Patients with Unilateral Hip Involvement. Follow-up at Skeletal Maturity. J Pediatr Orthop 2010; 30 (4): 357-64.
28. Dhawale A, Karatas AF, Holmes L, Rogers KJ, Dabney KW, Miller F. Long-term outcome of reconstruction of the hip in young children with cerebral palsy. Bone Joint J 2013; 95-B: 259–65.
29. Shore BJ, Graham HK. Management of Moderate to Severe Hip Displacement in Non-ambulatory Children with Cerebral Palsy. J Bone Joint Surg 2017; 5 (12):e4.

 


How to Cite this Article:  Jain J | Lever Arm dysfunction of Hips in Cerebral Palsy | International Journal of Paediatric Orthopaedics | January-April 2024; 10(1): 14-19 .  https://doi.org/10.13107/ijpo.2024.v10i01.173

(Article Text HTML)      (Full Text PDF)


Understanding the Biomechanics of Lever Arm Disorders in Cerebral Palsy

Volume 10 | Issue 1 | January-April 2024 | Page: 09-13 | Jayanth Sampath, Taral Nagda

DOI- https://doi.org/10.13107/ijpo.2024.v10i01.172

Submitted: 01/02/2024; Reviewed: 14/02/2024; Accepted: 18/03/2024; Published: 10/04/2024


Authors: Jayanth Sampath MS Ortho [1], Taral Nagda MS Ortho [2]

[1] Department of Paediatric Orthopaedics, Rainbow Children’s Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.

[2] Department of Paediatric Orthopaedics, SRCC NH Children’s Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Address of Correspondence

Dr. Jayanth S. Sampath,
Rainbow Children’s Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: jayanthdoc@gmail.com


Abstract

Levers in the human body play an important role in facilitating efficient movement. Muscle forces act around the axis of movement of adjacent joints. The normal moment of a joint (M) is the product of the muscle force (F) and the length of lever arm (d). The primary neurological insult in cerebral palsy (CP) causes shortening of muscles, joint contractures, and torsional abnormalities in bones. The resulting ineffective lever arm leads to a failure to produce an appropriate torque and subsequent gait abnormalities. Therefore, the effects of lever arm dysfunction should be considered when gait improvement surgery is being offered to children with CP. This review will explain the role of levers in normal human biomechanics and the significance of lever arm dysfunction in the management of CP.
Keywords: Biomechanics, Lever arm, Disorder, Cerebral palsy


References

1. Gage JR, editor. The treatment of gait problems in cerebral palsy. 2nd ed. London: Mac Keith Press; 2004. Treatment principles for crouch gait; p 382-97.
2. Theologis T. Lever arm dysfunction in cerebral palsy gait. J Child Orthop. 2013;7(5):379-382.
3. Kalkman BM, Bar-On L, Cenni F, et al. Achilles tendon moment arm length is smaller in children with cerebral palsy than in typically developing children. J Biomech. 2017;56:48-54.
4. Õunpuu S, Solomito M, Bell K, Pierz K. Long-term outcomes of external femoral derotation osteotomies in children with cerebral palsy. Gait Posture. 2017;56(March 2016):82-88..
5. Kim HY, Cha YH, Chun YS, Shin HS. Correlation of the torsion values measured by rotational profile, kinematics, and CT study in CP patients. Gait Posture. 2017;57:241-245.
6. Saglam Y, Ekin Akalan N, Temelli Y, Kuchimov S. Femoral derotation osteotomy with multi-level soft tissue procedures in children with cerebral palsy: Does it improve gait quality? J Child Orthop. 2016;10(1):41-48.
7. Kadhim M, Miller F. Crouch gait changes after planovalgus foot deformity correction in ambulatory children with cerebral palsy. Gait Posture. 2014;39(2):793-798.
8. Kadhim M, Holmes L, Miller F. Long-term Outcome of Planovalgus Foot Surgical Correction in Children with Cerebral Palsy. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2013;52(6):697-703.
9. Kim HT, Jang JH, Ahn JM, Lee JS, Kang DJ. Early results of one-stage correction for hip instability in cerebral palsy. Clin Orthop Surg. 2012;4(2):139-148.
10. Ganjwala D. Multilevel orthopedic surgery for crouch gait in cerebral palsy: An evaluation using functional mobility and energy cost. Indian J Orthop. 2011;45(4):314..
11. Foroohar A, McCarthy JJ, Yucha D, Clarke S, Brey J. Head-shaft angle measurement in children with cerebral palsy. J Pediatr Orthop. 2009;29(3):248-250.
12. Rethlefsen SA. Causes of Intoeing Gait in Children with Cerebral Palsy. J Bone Jt Surg. 2006;88(10):2175..
13. Čobeljić G, Djorić I, Bajin Z, Despot B. Femoral derotation osteotomy in cerebral palsy: Precise determination by tables. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;(452):216-224.
14. Kadhim M, Holmes L, Church C, Henley J, Miller F. Pes planovalgus deformity surgical correction in ambulatory children with cerebral palsy. J Child Orthop. 2012;6(3):217-227.
15. Aiona M, Calligeros K, Pierce R. Coronal plane knee moments improve after correcting external tibial torsion in patients with cerebral palsy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(5):1327-1333.
16. Davids JR, Gibson TW, Pugh LI, Hardin JW. Proximal femoral geometry before and after varus rotational osteotomy in children with cerebral palsy and neuromuscular hip dysplasia. J Pediatr Orthop. 2013;33(2):182-189.
17. Rodda JM, Sciences H. Severe Crouch Gait in the Sagittal Gait Patterns of Spastic Diplegic Cerebral Palsy : the Impact of Single Event Multilevel Surgery. 2005;(November).
18. Inan M, Altinta?? F, Duru I. The evaluation and management of rotational deformity in cerebral palsy. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2009;43(2):106-112.
19. Heimkes B, Stotz S, Heid T. Pathogenesis and prevention of spastic hip dislocation. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1992;130(5):413-418.
20. Pirpiris M, Trivett A, Baker R, Rodda J, Nattrass GR, Graham HK. Femoral derotation osteotomy in spastic diplegia. J Bone Jt Surg. 2003;85(2):265-272.


How to Cite this Article:  Sampath J, Nagda T | Understanding the Biomechanics of Lever Arm Disorders in Cerebral Palsy | International Journal of Paediatric Orthopaedics | January-April 2024; 10(1): 09-13 . https://doi.org/10.13107/ijpo.2024.v10i01.172

(Article Text HTML)      (Full Text PDF)


Indian Hip Surveillance Guidelines for Children with Cerebral Palsy

Volume 10 | Issue 1 | January-April 2024 | Page: 02-08 | Ashok N Johari, Dhiren Ganjwala, Alaric Aroojis

DOI- https://doi.org/10.13107/ijpo.2024.v10i01.171

Submitted: 12/01/2024; Reviewed: 09/02/2024; Accepted: 18/02/2024; Published: 10/04/2024


Authors: Ashok N Johari MS Ortho [1], Dhiren Ganjwala MS Ortho [2], Alaric Aroojis MS Ortho [3]

[1] Department of Paediatric Orthopaedic & Spine Surgery, Children’s Orthopaedic Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
[2] Department of Paediatric Orthopaedic Surgery, Ganjwala Orthopaedic Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
[3] Department of Paediatric Orthopaedics, Bai Jerbai Wadia Hospital for Children, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Address of Correspondence

Dr. Alaric Aroojis
Hon. Consultant, Paediatric Orthopaedics, Bai Jerbai Wadia Hospital for Children, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: aaroojis@gmail.com


Guidelines

Preamble:
Hip displacement is the second most common musculoskeletal impairment in children with cerebral palsy (CP). More than one-third of the children are affected by this problem. Hip displacement in children with CP is often asymptomatic until the hip is partially or fully dislocated, resulting in pain, gait disturbances, impaired sitting balance, difficulty in perineal care and pressure sores. The incidence of hip displacement is much higher in non-ambulatory children.

It is now well-known that hip surveillance programmes can effectively detect hip displacement early, leading to earlier proactive management with better outcomes. National and provincial hip surveillance programmes have been developed and adopted in various regions of the world, with evidence supporting the role of surveillance in preventing dislocations and avoiding the need for salvage surgery.

To offer similar benefits to Indian children with CP, a guidelines development project on National Hip Surveillance Program for Cerebral Palsy was initiated in May 2020. Based on the outcome of the one-year guidelines’ development project, this guidelines document was prepared from an Indian practice perspective.

About development of this Indian guideline:
Professional organisations whose members are involved in the care of children with CP were involved in the formation of this guideline. A National Expert Committee was constituted with representatives of these organisations. Advice was sought from international experts on this topic who acted as the Advisory Committee.

In phase 1: The Expert Committee reviewed more than 80 published research articles related to various aspects of hip displacement in CP. Key points from these articles were listed. National guidelines from other countries/regions were also reviewed, discussed and referred.

In phase 2: All important questions related to hip surveillance were listed. These questions were circulated to all the members of the expert committee. The Delphi process was used to develop consensus on these practical questions. When more than 80% of group members agreed to a particular viewpoint, it was considered as a consensus. With two rounds of the Delphi process, the committee reached a consensus on every single question. Consensus statements were listed.

In phase 3: The guideline was drafted based on these consensus statements. The main document was written keeping the from a healthcare professional’s perspective. A simple version of this guideline was also prepared to spread awareness about this important message to the caregivers / family / healthcare aid workers.

NATIONAL GUIDELINES COMMITTEE

STEERING COMMITTEE
Dr. Ashok N. Johari
Paediatric Orthopaedic & Spine Surgeon, Children’s Orthopaedic Centre, Mumbai, India

Dr. Dhiren Ganjwala
Consultant Paediatric Orthopaedic Surgeon, Ganjwala Orthopaedic Hospital, Ahmedabad, India

Dr. Alaric Aroojis
Hon. Consultant, Paediatric Orthopaedics, Bai Jerbai Wadia Hospital for Children, Mumbai, India

ADVISORY BOARD
Dr. Kishore Mulpuri
Paediatric Orthopaedic Surgeon, BC Children’s Hospital, Vancouver, Canada

Stacey Miller
Lead Physiotherapist, BC Children’s Hospital, Vancouver, Canada

Dr. Abhay Khot
Paediatric Orthopaedic Surgeon, Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia

Dr. Mohan Belthur
Attending Paediatric Orthopaedic Surgeon, Phoenix Children’s Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

COMMITTEE MEMBERS
Dr. Sakti Prasad Das
Director, SV NIRTAR, Orissa, India

Dr. Anand Varma
Dept. of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubballi, India

Asha Chitnis
Consultant Paediatric Therapist, Vedanta Programs, Mumbai, India

Madhavi Kelapure
Paediatric Physiotherapist, Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital, Pune, India

Trupti Nikharge
Occupational Therapist, B.Y.L.Nair Hospital, Mumbai, India

Dr. Meenakshi Murthy Girish
Professor & Head, Paediatrics, AIIMS, Nagpur, India

Dr. Leena Srivastava
Head, Child Development and Guidance Centre, Bharati Vidyapeeth Medical College and Hospital, Pune, India

Dr. Anaita Udwadia-Hegde
Consultant Paediatric Neurologist, Jaslok Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, India.

Dr. Surekha Rajadhyaksha
Professor and Chief of Paediatric Neurology and Epilepsy, Bharati Vidyapeeth Hospital, Pune, India

Dr. Mahesh Kamate
Professor of Paediatric Neurology, KAHER’s JN Medical College, Belagavi, India

Dr. Sandeep Patwardhan
Professor of Orthopaedics, Paediatric orthopaedics, Sancheti Institute for Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Pune, India

Dr. T.S. Gopakumar
Professor of Orthopaedics, MES Medical College, Perinthalmanna, Malappuram, India

Dr. P N Gupta
Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Govt. Medical College Hospital, Chandigarh, India

Dr. Jayanth Sampath
Consultant Paediatric Orthopaedic Surgeon, Rainbow Children’s Hospital, Bangalore, India

Dr. Binu Kurian
Consultant Paediatric Orthopaedic Surgeon, St. John’s Medical College Hospital, Bangalore, India

Dr. Abhay Gahukamble
Assistant Professor, Dept of Orthopaedic Surgery at Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, India

Dr. Sanjay Wadhwa
Professor, Dept. of PMR, AIIMS, New Delhi, India

Punita V. Solanki
Occupational Therapist, Mumbai, India

Dr. Rekha MittalAdditional Director (Paediatric Neurology), Madhukar Rainbow Children’s Hospital, New Delhi, India

Aijaaz Ashai
Director & HOD, Adams Wylie Physio Rehab Center, Mumbai, India


This guideline is for the medical professionals who are involved in the care of children with cerebral palsy (CP).

Children with cerebral palsy are at increased risk for hip displacement. Hip displacement may occur gradually and may not be painful initially. However, many dislocated hips become painful eventually and lead to reduced function and impaired quality of life. [1]

What is hip surveillance?
Hip surveillance is a process of actively monitoring the child for early identification of hip displacement. It is carried out by clinical and radiographic examinations at regular intervals, so that silent hip impairments are identified. When hip impairments are identified early, they can be managed by less aggressive surgical interventions, thus leading to better structural and functional outcomes. Hip surveillance has been found to be effective in several large population-based studies. [2]

Who should be surveilled?
All children and youth diagnosed with CP and those children not yet diagnosed with CP but for whom there is a clinical suspicion of having CP should be enrolled for surveillance. Besides the spastic variety, dystonic, athetoid, ataxic and hypotonic types of CP are included in hip surveillance.

By whom should the child be surveilled?
All trained clinicians working with children with CP can carry out hip surveillance. These include paediatricians, developmental paediatricians, paediatric neurologists, physical therapists, occupational therapists, physical medicine & rehabilitation experts, orthopaedic surgeons, and paediatric orthopaedic surgeons.

How the child should be surveilled?
Each visit for surveillance consists of two components: a clinical examination and a radiographic examination.

The clinical examination includes determining / re-confirming the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level. Inquiring about hip pain that may be present when moving the hip, changing positions, when looking after personal care.

The passive range of abduction is measured for each hip with maximum possible extension at the hips and knees (Figure 1). Attention is given to the presence of pain while moving the hip. Gait observation should identify cases having Winters, Gage & Hicks (WGH) type 4 gait pattern. They form a subset that deserves special attention.

The examiner also looks for pelvic asymmetry and scoliosis (Figure 2).

The radiographic examination consists of taking an antero-posterior (AP) pelvis radiograph in a supine position with standardized positioning. The pelvis is squared whilst positioning. The hips are kept in neutral abduction/adduction (Figure 3). The patellae should face upwards. For children having flexion deformity at the hips, both lower limbs are flexed at the hips till lumbar lordosis is obliterated. This prevents anterior tilting of the pelvis (Figure 4 & 5).

Migration percentage (MP) is measured on an anteroposterior radiograph. [3] It measures the percentage of the ossified femoral head that lies outside the ossified acetabular roof. To measure the MP, a horizontal line is drawn through each triradiate cartilage (solid horizontal line) and a vertical line is drawn perpendicular to it at the lateral margin of the ossified acetabulum (solid vertical line). Two lines are drawn parallel to this solid vertical line at the medial and lateral border of the ossified femoral head (dotted lines). The distance between these two dotted lines is the width of the ossified femoral head (B). The width of the femoral head which is lateral to the solid vertical line (A) is divided by the width of the ossified femoral head (B). Migration percentage = A/B x 100 (Figure 6).


Migration percentage (MP) is measured for each hip separately.

How frequently should the child be surveilled?
Surveillance should preferably start by the of 2 years for children for whom the diagnosis of CP is made, or even at an earlier age when the diagnosis of CP is suspected. Surveillance frequency depends mainly on the GMFCS level, age of the child, and the age at which hip surveillance is started.
For the sake of easy understanding, the CP population is divided into 3 groups.
• GMFCS level I & II
• GMFCS level III
• GMFCS level IV & V

Children with GMFCS level I & II function should have a clinical and radiographic examination at 2, 6, and 10 years. In addition, they should have clinical examination at age 4 years and 8 years. Children with a Group IV hemiplegic gait pattern should have a clinical exam and x-ray every 2 years after the age 10 years till skeletal maturity.

Children with GMFCS level III function require clinical and radiographical examination every year till the age of 8 years. After 8 years, hip surveillance is carried out every 2 years till skeletal maturity if MP remains less than 30% and MP is stable (stability defined as <10% change in MP over a 12-month period). If a child enters hip surveillance after the age of 8 years, the child should have yearly radiograph for first 2 years and thereafter the frequency is reduced to once in 2 years..

Children with GMFCS level IV and V function should have a clinical and radiographic examinations every 6 months for the first two years. If the MP is less than 30% and MP is stable (stability defined as <10% change in MP over a 12-month period), clinical exams and imaging may be reduced to annual visit. Children at GMFCS level IV and V should have a clinical and radiographic examination every year till skeletal maturity. If a child enters hip surveillance after the age of 4 years, the child should have a radiograph every 6 months for the first 2 years and thereafter the frequency is reduced to annual x-rays.

If in doubt about the GMFCS level, consider the child to have a more severe GMFCS level and accordingly follow guidelines for that GMFCS level.

For quick visual reference please see the figure 7.

Time of discharge from hip surveillance

Children at GMFCS levels I & II are discharged at 10 years if the MP is stable and less than 30%. An exception is a child with Winter & Gage hemiplegic type 4 gait, who should be followed up till skeletal maturity.

Children at GMFCS levels III, IV & V are discharged when they attain skeletal maturity, have MP < 30%, and when pelvic obliquity and scoliosis are not progressive on clinical examinations. Closure of the triradiate cartilage on the AP pelvis x-ray is used to indicate skeletal maturity (Figure 8).

Exception: Child having MP > 30% or progressive pelvic obliquity or scoliosis requires continued surveillance.

What should be the further line of action after hip surveillance?
A child is referred to paediatric orthopaedic surgeons, if
• MP value is 30% or more
• If MP is less than 30% but a child has hip abduction less than 30 degrees
• If MP is less than 30% but a child has hip pain during a clinical exam
• If MP is less than 30% but child / family reports pain at hip during activities
All other children continue to undergo hip surveillance till they are discharged from the surveillance program.

Additional information:
Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS)
The GMFCS is a validated classification system used to describe the gross motor function of children with CP. [4] The expanded and revised version of the GMFCS which is available online is used as a reference. It can be downloaded free of charge from the website https://www.canchild.ca/system/tenon/assets/attachments/000/000/058/original/GMFCS-ER_English.pdf

The GMFCS classifies the children and young adults into five levels on the basis of their self-initiated movement with particular emphasis on sitting, walking, and wheeled mobility. The GMFCS has five levels for describing differences in severity of motor abilities. Distinctions between levels are based on functional limitations, the need for hand-held mobility devices or wheeled mobility. For different age groups, separate descriptions are provided. Generally, it takes only a few minutes to assign a GMFCS level.
The GMFCS is relatively stable but in small children it is likely to change. [5] So, it is important that during each visit, GMFCS level is reconfirmed or re-evaluated.

GMFCS levels I & II suggest a child who is ambulatory without handheld mobility aid. Figure 9 & 10 represent typical GMFCS I & II children in the age group of 6 to 12 years.

GMFCS level III suggests a child who is ambulatory with handheld mobility aid. Figure 11 represents typical GMFCS III children in the age group of 6 to 12 years.

GMFCS level IV represents a child who is a marginal ambulator. For walking, they need the help of a caretaker and the mobility aid (Figure 12). Child at GMFCS level V is considered non-ambulatory (Figure 13).

Winters, Gage and Hicks (WGH) type 4 gait
Winters, Gage and Hicks described four types of gait pattern in hemiplegic children with CP. [6] This classification was based on the sagittal plane kinematics of the ankle, knee, hip and pelvis. The Australian CP group added frontal and transverse planes kinematics to this classification. Child with type 4 gait walks with hip flexed, adducted and internally rotated, knee flexed and ankle in equinus. (Figure 14) Type 4 child can be distinguished easily by gait observation. One does not need computerised gait analysis for identifying this gait pattern.

Key points
• Hip Surveillance detects hip displacement early and reduces the need for major surgeries.
• Hip surveillance can be carried out by all medical and allied healthcare professionals involved in the care of children with CP.
• Children with all motor types of CP require hip surveillance.
• Surveillance frequency mainly depends on the GMFCS level and the age of the child.
• Migration percentage is used to quantify the severity of hip displacement on standardised AP pelvis radiographs.
• A child is referred to a paediatric orthopaedic / orthopaedic surgeon if MP value is 30% or more, hip abduction is less than 30 degrees, or if hip pain is reported during clinical examination or while performing certain activities.


References

1. Ramstad K, Terjesen T: Hip pain is more frequent in severe hip displacement: A population-based study of 77 children with cerebral palsy. J Pediatr Orthop B 2016;25: 217-221.
2. Hagglund G, Alriksson-Schmidt A, Lauge-Pedersen H, Robdy-Bousquet E, Wagner P, Westbom L: Prevention of dislocation of the hip in children with cerebral palsy: 20 year results of a population-based prevention programme. Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1546-1552.
3. Reimers, J. The stability of the hip in children. A radiological study of the results of muscle surgery in cerebral palsy. Acta Orthop Scand 1980; 184: S1-100.
4. Wood E, Rosenbaum P. The gross motor function classification system for cerebral palsy: a study of reliability and stability over time. Dev Med Child Neurol 2000; 42: 292– 96.
5. Palisano RJ, Cameron D, Rosenbaum PL, Walter SD, Russell D. Stability of the gross motor function classification system. Dev Med Child Neurol 2006; 48: 424– 28.
6. Winters T, Gage J, Hicks R. Gait patterns in spastic hemiplegia in children and young adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987; 69(3): 437-441.


How to Cite this Article:  Johari AN, Ganjwala D, Aroojis A | Indian Hip Surveillance Guidelines for Children with Cerebral Palsy | International Journal of Paediatric Orthopaedics | January-April 2024; 10(1): 02-08 . https://doi.org/10.13107/ijpo.2024.v10i01.171

(Article Text HTML)      (Full Text PDF)


Editorial

Volume 10 | Issue 1 | January-April 2024 | Page: 01 | Jayanth S. Sampath

DOI- https://doi.org/10.13107/ijpo.2024.v10.i01.170


Authors: Jayanth S. Sampath FRCSEd (Tr & Orth) [1]

[1] Department of Orthopaedics, Rainbow Children’s Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.

Address of Correspondence

Dr. Jayanth S. Sampath,
Rainbow Children’s Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: editor.posi.ijpo@gmail.com


Editorial

The current issue of IJPO is marked by several improvements that have been long overdue. The most important was the constitution of an Editorial Board of ten POSI members, responsible for day-to-day journal affairs. As editor, it is a pleasure to see more hands on deck. Our lead time for the publication of new issues is currently 3 months. The profiles of the new Editorial Committee members are available on the IJPO website. Our social media presence has improved through regular updates on Instagram and Facebook. We thank Dr Easwar T Ramani, POSI Webmaster for the efforts to improve the visibility and accessibility of the POSI journal. We have renewed our efforts to accredit the journal with reputed international indexing bodies.
This issue is dedicated to various aspects of cerebral palsy, an important problem in our practice. The lead article is the Indian hip surveillance guidelines for children with cerebral palsy. The result of over 2 years’ effort by POSI, led by senior members Dr Ashok Johari, Dr Dhiren Ganjwala and Dr Alaric Aroojis, the guidelines provide practical advice to the clinician for the early diagnosis of hip displacement in cerebral palsy. We have followed this with a mini-symposium on lever arm dysfunction. Starting with a basic refresher on biomechanics, subsequent articles provide a detailed account of how lever arm dysfunction affects normal function in a child with cerebral palsy, the importance of clinical examination for accurate diagnosis, the role of various investigations including gait analysis and the management of lever arm dysfunction at different levels from the hip to the foot. The symposium finishes with a flourish, a comprehensive guide to the management of upper limb problems in CP. I am sure every article in this issue will add to your understanding of cerebral palsy. Please do share the articles with your trainees and fellows. IJPO issues are easily downloadable free of charge and in full-text format from our website www.ijpoonline.com
We invite your suggestions and comments for any improvements to the journal. Kindly write to us editor@ijpo.com
It is my pleasure to acknowledge the contributions of authors, reviewers, editors, and the backend team who have been instrumental in bringing out this issue. The cover page artwork acknowledges the importance of hip surveillance in cerebral palsy.

Sincerely

Dr Jayanth S Sampath
Editor,

International Journal of Paediatric Orthopaedics


How to Cite this Article:  Sampat JS | Editorial | International Journal of Paediatric Orthopaedics | January-April 2024; 10(1): 01. https://doi.org/10.13107/ijpo.2024.v10.i01.170

(Article Text HTML)      (Full Text PDF)


Musculoskeletal Tuberculosis in Children

Volume 9 | Issue 3 | September-December 2023 | Page: 28-34 | Santoshini Nemuri, Mandar Agashe

DOI- https://doi.org/10.13107/ijpo.2023.v09.i03.160


Authors: Santoshini Nemuri MS Ortho [1], Mandar Agashe MS Ortho [1]

[1] Department of Orthopaedics, Agashe Paediatric SuperSpeciality Clinic, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Address of Correspondence

Dr. Mandar Agashe
Chief consultant, Department of Orthopaedics, Agashe Paediatric SuperSpeciality Clinic, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: mandarortho@gmail.com


Abstract

Paediatric musculoskeletal tuberculosis is very important to understand as it shares similar clinical, radiological and hematologocal findings with other infectious and non-infectitious conditions . It has become a major health hazard because of its association with immunocompromised states like HIV, Diabetes mellitus and chronic renal and liver diseases. Diagnosis is delayed in paediatric musculoskeletal tuberculosis because of lack of awareness of disease , non-specific clinical and laboratory findings. TB culture is considered as the gold standard in diagnosing tuberculosis and also, detecting drug sensitivity. Because of its potential for multi-drug resistance, there is a dilemma regarding drug of choice and duration of treatment. Surgery is reserved for obtaining samples to establish diagnosis, debridement and sequestrectomy in recalcitrant infections and correction of deformities to restore joint function. This review article briefs about classical clinical presentation, atypical and multifocal musculoskeletal tuberculosis, radiological and laboratory investigations and management of paediatric musculoskeletal tuberculosis.
Musculoskeletal tuberculosis should be kept as a differential diagnosis when managing a case of musculoskeletal infection in children because of its non- specific presentation. Imaging such as MRI and advanced microbiological analysis aids in arriving correct diagnosis. Multidrug chemotherapy is mainstay of treatment. Radical curettage and, antituberculous chemotherapy followed by a period of immobilisation and rehabilitation will give excellent results
Keywords: Paediatric musculoskeletal tuberculosis, multifocal tuberculosis, Tubercular osteomyelitis


References

1. Agarwal A. Paediatric osteoarticular tuberculosis: A review. Vol. 11, Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma. Elsevier B.V.; 2020. p. 202–7.
2. Gupta S, Parihar A, Singh S, Agarwal A, Agarwal S. Pediatric Osteoarticular Tuberculosis as a Diagnostic Dilemma and a Review of Literature. Cureus. 2022 Mar 11;14(3):e23053.doi:10.7759/cureus.23053. PMID: 35308187; PMCID: PMC8926030.
3. Agashe VM, Johari AN, Shah M, Anjum R, Romano C, Drago L, et al. Diagnosis of osteoarticular tuberculosis: Perceptions, protocols, practices, and priorities in the endemic and non-endemic areas of the world—a waiot view. Vol. 8, Microorganisms. MDPI AG; 2020. p. 1–19.
4. Çay U, Alabaz D, Gündeşlioglu OO, Mirioglu A, Pehlivan UA. Skeletal Tuberculosis in Pediatric Population for 15 Years; Twenty Cases from Southern Turkey. Niger J Clin Pract. 2023 Nov 1;26(11):1602–9.
5. Shah I, Dani S, Shetty NS, Mehta R, Nene A. Profile of osteoarticular tuberculosis in children. Indian Journal of Tuberculosis. 2020 Jan 1;67(1):43–5.
6. Kritsaneepaiboon S, Andres MM, Tatco VR, Lim CCQ, Concepcion NDP. Extrapulmonary involvement in pediatric tuberculosis. Vol. 47, Pediatric Radiology. Springer Verlag; 2017. p. 1249–59.
7. Garg RK, Somvanshi DS. Spinal tuberculosis: A review. Vol. 34, Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine. 2011. p. 440–54.
8. Dawani A, Gupta AK, Jana M. Imaging in Pediatric Extra-Pulmonary Tuberculosis. Vol. 86, Indian Journal of Pediatrics. Springer; 2019. p. 459–67.
9. Saraf SK, Tuli SM. Tuberculosis of hip A current concept review. In: Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. Medknow Publications; 2015. p. 1–9.
10. Kant KS, Agarwal A, Suri T, Gupta N, Verma I, Shaharyar A. Tuberculosis of knee region in children: A series of eight cases. Trop Doct. 2014;44(1):29–32.
11. Prakash J, Mehtani A. Hand and wrist tuberculosis in paediatric patients – our experience in 44 patients. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics Part B. 2017;26(3):250–60.
12. Shrestha OP, Sitoula P, Hosalkar HS, Banskota AK, Spiegel DA. Bone and Joint Tuberculosis. University of Pennsylvania Orthopaedic Journal. 2010;20:23–28.
13. Mahomed N, Kilborn T, Smit EJ, Chu WCW, Young CYM, Koranteng N, et al. Tuberculosis revisted: classic imaging findings in childhood. Pediatr Radiol. 2023 Aug 1;53(9):1799–828.
14. Dhillon MS, Nagi ON. Tuberculosis of the foot and ankle. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002 May;(398):107-13. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200205000- 00015. PMID: 11964638.
15. Mittal R, Gupta V, Rastogi S. Tuberculosis of the foot. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery – Series B. 1999 Nov;81(6):997–1000.
16. Erol B, Topkar MO, Basar H, Caliskan E, Okay E. Solitary cystic tuberculosis of the distal femur and proximal tibia in children. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics Part B. 2015 Jun 19;24(4):315–20.
17. Pigrau-Serrallach C, Rodríguez-Pardo D. Bone and joint tuberculosis. European Spine Journal. 2013 Jun;22(SUPPL.4).
18. Aouraghe H, Benchekroun S, Mahraoui C, Elhafidi N. Multifocal tuberculosis in children: A case of spinal tuberculosis. Int J Mycobacteriol. 2023 Apr 1;12(2):204–6.
19. Syed Zaki A, Bhongade S. Multifocal Skeletal Tuberculosis. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2012 Nov; 12(4):531-533. doi: 10.12816/0003184 PMID: 23275855
20. Prasad S, Wakhlu A, Misra R, Aggarwal A, Lawrence A, Gupta R, et al. Features of extra-spinal musculoskeletal tuberculosis: A retrospective study from an North Indian Tertiary Care Institute. Indian J Rheumatol. 2017 Sep 1;12(3):146–51.
21. Santos FCF, do Nascimento ALA, Lira LA de S, Lima JF da C, Montenegro R de A, Montenegro LML, et al. Bone tuberculosis: A case report on child. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2013 Mar;46(2):249–51.
22. Paediatric TB Management Guideline 2022 Developed By The National Tuberculosis Elimination Programme Draft.
23. Papavasiliou VA, Petropoulos A V. Bone and joint tuberculosis in childhood. Acta Orthop. 1981;52(1):1–4.


How to Cite this Article:  Nemuri S, Agashe M | Musculoskeletal Tuberculosis in Children | International Journal of Paediatric Orthopaedics | September-December 2023; 9(3): 28-34.| https://doi.org/10.13107/ijpo.2023.v09.i03.160

(Article Text HTML)      (Full Text PDF)


Introduction to Paediatric Musculoskeletal Infections -A Review Article

Volume 9 | Issue 3 | September-December 2023 | Page: 02-08 | Suresh Chand, Bhushan Sagade, Udit Agarwal, Nishant Jagdale, Smit Rajput

DOI- https://doi.org/10.13107/ijpo.2023.v09.i03.156


Authors: Suresh Chand MS Ortho [1], Bhushan Sagade MS Ortho [2], Udit Agarwal MS Ortho [1], Nishant Jagdale DNB Ortho [2], Smit Rajput MD [3]

[1] Department of Paediatric Orthopaedics, King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, India.
[2] Department of Paediatric Orthopaedics, Bai Jerbai Wadia Hospital for Children, Mumbai, India.
[3] Department of Internal Medicine, East Carolina University and ECU Health Medical Center, Greenville, North Carolina, USA.

Address of Correspondence

Dr. Nishant Jagdale,
Fellow in Paediatric Orthopaedics, Department of Paediatric Orthopaedics, Bai Jerbai Wadia Hospital for Children, Mumbai, India.
E-mail: nishant93ortho@gmail.com


Abstract

Paediatric Musculoskeletal Infections include osteomyelitis, septic arthritis, pyomyositis, surgical site infections, tuberculosis, and fungal infections with some infrequent manifestations like purpura fulminans, necrotizing fasciitis, soft tissue abscess and septic bursitis. Osteomyelitis and septic arthritis are two common Musculoskeletal Infections. Vertebral tuberculosis is the most common form of skeletal tuberculosis. Staphylococcus aureus is the most frequent cause of Paediatric Musculoskeletal Infections, followed by streptococci. They can be classified on the basis of pathogen, anatomical site, spread, severity etc. Pathogenic organisms may reach a bone or soft tissue location by either of the three means: (a) direct inoculation from penetrating trauma or surgery, (b) contiguous spread from an adjacent soft tissue infection, (c) hematogenous spread from a distant focus of infection with hematogenous spread being the most common cause. It is a complex interplay between the host and the pathogen which plays major role in these infections. Peculiar anatomy of the metaphysis with classical hairpin loop system of the end arterioles and venous sinusoids aids in pathogen entry into the host. After successful invasion of the host, bacteria escapes the host immunity through various mechanisms, complement component pathway being the most common way. Also the various toxins and proteins secreted by bacteria plays an important role in adhesion, invasion, escape form immunity and spread of the infection. This review article helps in understanding this complex interplay between host and pathogen which ultimately results in infection

Keywords: Paediatric Musculoskeletal infections, Osteomyelitis, Pyomyositis, Septic Arthritis.


References

1. Trapani S. Musculoskeletal infections in childhood: Recognize early to quickly and properly treat. Glob Pediatr. 2024 Mar 1; 7:100108. doi: 10.1016/j.gpeds.2023.100108
2. Hunter, Sarah & Chan, Heidi & Crawford, et al: (2023). Appropriate Antibiotic Duration in Pediatric Bone and Joint Infection: A Systematic Review. Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America. 5. doi: 10.55275/JPOSNA-2023-736.
3. Hannon M, Lyons T. Pediatric musculoskeletal infections. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2023 Jun 1;35(3):309–15.
4. Radcliffe G. (iii) Osteomyelitis – a historical and basic sciences review. Orthop Trauma. 2015 Aug 1;29(4):243–52.
5. Klenerman L. A history of osteomyelitis from the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery: 1948 TO 2006. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 May;89(5):667-70. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B5.19170. PMID: 17540756.
6. Nelaton A.: Elements de pathologie chirurgical1844.Germer BailliereParispp. 595-597
7. Schmitt SK. Osteomyelitis. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2017 Jun;31(2):325-338. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2017.01.010. PMID: 28483044.
8. Ahmad S, Barik S, Mishra D, et al: Epidemiology of paediatric pyogenic musculoskeletal infections in a developing country. Sudan J Paediatr. 2022;22(1):54-60. doi: 10.24911/SJP.106-1616783478. PMID: 35958066.
9. Jaña FC NETO, Ortega CS, Goiano EO. Epidemiological study of osteoarticular infections in children. Acta Ortop Bras. 2018 May-Jun;26(3):201-205. doi: 10.1590/1413-785220182603145650. PMID: 30038548.
10. Shah I, Dani S, Shetty NS, et al: Profile of osteoarticular tuberculosis in children. Indian J Tuberc. 2020 Jan;67(1):43-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijtb.2019.08.014. Epub 2019 Aug 22. PMID: 32192616.
11. Jain AK, Jaggi KR, Bhayana H, et al: Drug-resistant Spinal Tuberculosis. Indian J Orthop. 2018 Mar-Apr;52(2):100-107. doi: 10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_306_17. PMID: 29576636.
12. Mohamad M, Steiger C, Spyropoulou V, et al: Clinical, biological and bacteriological characteristics of osteoarticular infections in infants less than 12 months of age. Future Microbiol. 2021 Apr;16:389-397. doi: 10.2217/fmb-2020-0070. Epub 2021 Apr 13. PMID: 33847142.
13. Shenoy B, Singhal T, Yewale V, et al: Indian Academy of Pediatrics Consensus Statement on Diagnosis and Management of Bone and Joint Infections in Children. INDIAN Pediatr. 2024;61.
14. Agarwal A, Aggarwal AN. Bone and Joint Infections in Children: Septic Arthritis. Indian J Pediatr. 2016 Aug;83(8):825-33. doi: 10.1007/s12098-015-1816-1. Epub 2015 Jul 21. PMID: 26189923.
15. Saavedra-Lozano J, Falup-Pecurariu O, Faust SN, et al: Bone and Joint Infections. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2017 Aug;36(8):788-799. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001635. PMID: 28708801.
16. Le Saux N. Diagnosis and management of acute osteoarticular infections in children. Paediatr Child Health. 2018 Aug;23(5):336-343. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxy049. Epub 2018 Jul 18. PMID: 30653632; PMCID: PMC6054183.
17. Morrey BF, Peterson HA. Hematogenous pyogenic osteomyelitis in children. Orthop Clin North Am. 1975 Oct;6(4):935-51. PMID: 1178165.
18. Hatzenbuehler J, Pulling TJ. Diagnosis and management of osteomyelitis. Am Fam Physician. 2011 Nov 1;84(9):1027-33. PMID: 22046943.
19. Roderick MR, Shah R, Rogers V, et al: Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO) – advancing the diagnosis. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2016 Aug 30;14(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12969-016-0109-1. PMID: 27576444.
20. Vij N, Ranade AS, Kang P, et al: Primary Bacterial Pyomyositis in Children: A Systematic Review. J Pediatr Orthop. 2021 Oct 1;41(9):e849-e854. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001944. PMID: 34411048.
21. Taksande A, Vilhekar K, Gupta S. Primary pyomyositis in a child. Int J Infect Dis. 2009 Jul;13(4):e149-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2008.08.013. Epub 2008 Nov 13. PMID: 19013093.
22. Mignemi ME, Benvenuti MA, An TJ, et al: A Novel Classification System Based on Dissemination of Musculoskeletal Infection is Predictive of Hospital Outcomes. J Pediatr Orthop. 2018 May/Jun;38(5):279-286. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000811. PMID: 27299780.
23. Hotchen AJ, McNally MA, Sendi P. The Classification of Long Bone Osteomyelitis: A Systemic Review of the Literature. J Bone Jt Infect. 2017 Sep 12;2(4):167-174. doi: 10.7150/jbji.21050. PMID: 29119075.
24. Mader JT, Shirtliff M, Calhoun JH. Staging and staging application in osteomyelitis. Clin Infect Dis. 1997 Dec;25(6):1303-9. doi: 10.1086/516149. PMID: 9431368.
25. Stevenson AJ, Jones HW, Chokotho LC, et al: The Beit CURE Classification of Childhood Chronic Haematogenous Osteomyelitis–a guide to treatment. J Orthop Surg Res. 2015 Sep 17;10:144. doi: 10.1186/s13018-015-0282-9. PMID: 26384208
26. McHenry MC, Alfidi RJ, Wilde AH, Hawk WA. Hematogenous osteomyelitis; a changing disease. Cleve Clin Q. 1975 Spring;42(1):125-53. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.42.1.125. PMID: 1095249.
27. Copley L.A.B., Herring J.A., (2014) Infections of the Musculoskeletal System. In J.A. Herring (Ed). Tachdjian’s Paediatric Orthopaedics (5th ed, Vol-2, pp:1024 -1076e10) Elseweir, Saunders
28. Ciampolini J, Harding KG. Pathophysiology of chronic bacterial osteomyelitis. Why do antibiotics fail so often? Postgrad Med J. 2000;76(898):479–83.
29. Moore-Lotridge, S.N., Schoenecker, J.G. (2022). Pathology of Musculoskeletal Infections. In: Belthur, M.V., Ranade, A.S., Herman, M.J., Fernandes, J.A. (eds) Pediatric Musculoskeletal Infections. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95794-0_3
30. Scheman L.R., Janota M., & Lewin P. The production of experimental osteomyelitis: Preliminary report. JAMA, Nov 1 1941, 117:18, 1525-1529.
31. Hobo T: Zur Pathogenese der akuten hematogenen Osteomyelitis. Acta Sch Me Kioto 1921;4:1.
32. Trueta J. The three types of acute hematogenous osteomyelitis: A clinical and vascular study. J Bone Joint Surg. 1959, 41-B:4, 671-680.
33. Herring J.A., (2002) Bone and Joint Infections. Tachdjian’s Paediatric Orthopaedics (3rd ed, Vol-3, pp:1841 -1894) W.B. Saunders.
34. Ogden JA, Lister G: The pathology of Neonatal osteomyelitis. Pediatrics 1975;56-A:941
35. Whalen JL,Fitzgerald RH Jr, Morrissy RT: A histological study of acute hematogenous osteomyelitis following physeal injury in rabbits. J Bone Joint Surg 1988;70-A:1383
36. Morrissy RT, Haynes DW: Acute Hematogenous Osteomyelitis: A model with trauma as an etiology. J Pediatr Orthop 1989;9:447.
37. Manche E, Rombouts-Godin V, Rombouts JJ: {Acute Hematogenous Osteomyelitis due to ordinary germs in children with closed injuries: a study of 44 cases}.Acta Orthop Belg 1991;57:91
38. Hofstee MI, Muthukrishnan G, Atkins GJ, Riool M, Thompson K, Morgenstern M, Stoddart MJ, Richards RG, Zaat SAJ, Moriarty TF. Current Concepts of Osteomyelitis: From Pathologic Mechanisms to Advanced Research Methods. Am J Pathol. 2020 Jun;190(6):1151-1163. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2020.02.007. Epub 2020 Mar 16. PMID: 32194053
39. Rosenfeld S, Bernstein DT, Daram S, Dawson J, Zhang W. Predicting the presence of adjacent infections in septic arthritis in children. J Pediatr Orthop. 2016;36(1):70–4.
40. R. Cunningham, A. Cockayne, H. Humphreys. Clinical and molecular aspects of the pathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus bone and joint infections. J. Med Microbiol. – Vol. 44 (1996), 157-164
41. Flemming H.C., Wingender J., Szewzyk U., Steinberg P., Rice S.A., Kjelleberg S. Biofilms: an emergent form of bacterial life. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2016; 14: 563-575
42. Garzoni C., Kelley W.L. Staphylococcus aureus: new evidence for intracellular persistence. Trends Microbiol. 2009; 17: 59-65
43. Martinez-Aguilar G, Avalos-Mishaan A, Hulten K, et al: Community-acquired, methicillin-resistant and methicillin susceptible Staphylococcus aureus musculoskeletal infections in children, Pediatr Infect Dis J 23:701, 2004
44. Yang D., Wijenayaka A.R., Solomon L.B., Pederson S.M., Findlay D.M., Kidd S.P., Atkins G.J. Novel insights into Staphylococcus aureus deep bone infections: the involvement of osteocytes. mBio. 2018; 9: e00415-e00418
45. Kwiecinski J., Na M., Jarneborn A., Jacobsson G., Peetermans M., Verhamme P., Jin T. Tissue plasminogen activator coating on implant surfaces reduces Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016; 82: 394-401
46. Cicuéndez M, Doadrio JC, Hernández A, Portolés MT, Izquierdo-Barba I, Vallet-Regí M. Multifunctional pH sensitive 3D scaffolds for treatment and prevention of bone infection. Acta Biomater. 2018 Jan;65:450-461. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.11.009. Epub 2017 Nov 8. PMID: 29127064.


How to Cite this Article:  Chand S, Sagade B, Agarwa U, Jagdale N, Rajput S | Introduction to Paediatric Musculoskeletal Infections- A Review Article | International Journal of Paediatric Orthopaedics | September- December 2023; 9(3): 02-08.| https://doi.org/10.13107/ijpo.2023.v09.i03.156

(Article Text HTML)      (Full Text PDF)