Blog Elements - International Journal of Paediatric Orthopaedics

Half Sized Blog Element (Single Author Style)

Half Sized Blog Element (Multi Author Style)

Reliability of Beighton’s Score in a Pediatric Population

Volume 3 | Issue 1 | Jan-Jun 2017 | Page 9-11 | Nimesh G Patel, Peter Riddlestone, Roshan Gunalan, Anthony Gough, James Metcalfe, Ben Holroyd Authors : Nimesh G Patel [1], Peter Riddlestone [1], Roshan Gunalan [1], Anthony Gough [1], James Metcalfe [1], Ben Holroyd [1]. [1] Department of Paediatric Orthopaedics Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK Address […]

Analysis of Dimeglio Score with Modified Pirani Score for Assessment of Idiopathic Clubfoot Deformity in Infants: A Comparative Study!

Volume 3 | Issue 1 | Jan-Jun 2017 | Page 2-5| Vasu sharma, Vikas Gupta, Daipayan chatterjee, Akshat Sharma Authors : Vasu sharma [1], Vikas Gupta [2], Daipayan chatterjee [1], Akshat Sharma [1]. [1] Senior Resident, Central Institute of orthopaedics, VMMC & Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi. India. [2] Professor, Central Institute of orthopaedics, VMMC & Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi. India. Address of Correspondence Dr. Vasu Sharma […]

Reliability of Beighton’s Score in a Pediatric Population

Analysis of Dimeglio Score with Modified Pirani Score for Assessment of Idiopathic Clubfoot Deformity in Infants: A Comparative Study!

Full Sized Blog Element (Big Preview Pic)

Reliability of Beighton’s Score in a Pediatric Population

Volume 3 | Issue 1 | Jan-Jun 2017 | Page 9-11 | Nimesh G Patel, Peter Riddlestone, Roshan Gunalan, Anthony Gough, James Metcalfe, Ben Holroyd

Authors : Nimesh G Patel [1], Peter Riddlestone [1], Roshan Gunalan [1], Anthony Gough [1], James Metcalfe [1], Ben Holroyd [1].

[1] Department of Paediatric Orthopaedics Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK

Address of Correspondence
Dr. Nimesh Patel,
Department of Paediatric Orthopaedics Derriford Hospital Plymouth, UK
E-mial: dr.nimeshpatel1@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Beighton’s score (BS) is a valid screening tool in an adult population, but its use in pediatrics to assess generalized joint mobility is not fully validated. The correlation of hypermobility and joint pain in children is also not fully understood. We, therefore, aim to investigate the reliability of BS in the pediatric population.
Materials and Methods: Over a 3-month period, children presenting to our pediatric orthopedic unit had their BS measured by a trained orthopedic surgeon. Non-ambulatory children were excluded, as were those with known hypermobility syndrome or neuromuscular disorders.We also screened them for joint pain and measured their lower limb rotational profile.
Results: A total of 200 patients (92 males and 108 females) were assessed, aged between 3 and 15 years (mean 10.1). Mean standard deviation (SD) BS was 2.06 (2.2), and the range was 0–8. Comparing males versus females, mean BS SD was 1.71 (2.25) versus 2.36 (2.14); p=0.0378, age was 9.75 versus 10.13, and BS range was 0–7 versus 0–8.64 children (32%) complained of pain in at least one joint, though the mean SD BS in these patients was 1.71 (1.86).
Discussion: We found that the average BS was just over 2 in all of our children, though significantly lower in males.In adults, a score of 4 or higher has been attributed to generalized hypermobility, though a true diagnostic cutoff has not been defined in children.Since there is already an innate tendency to have an increased BS in normal children, it makes interpretation of the score in a pediatric population difficult and less meaningful.Of note, there was no correlation between arthralgia and a high BS or abnormal lower limb rotational profile. We therefore do not recommend routine measurement of BS to diagnose hypermobility in a pediatric population.
Keywords: Beighton’s score, hypermobility, joint laxity, pediatric population

References

1. Beighton P, Horan F. Orthopaedic aspects of the Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1969;51:444-53.
2. Hakim AJ, Sahota A. Joint hypermobility and skin elasticity: The hereditary disorders of connective tissue. ClinDermatol 2006;24:521-33.
3. Kirk JA, Ansell BM, BywatersEG.The hypermobility syndrome, Musculoskeletal complaints associated with generalized joint hypermobility.Ann Rheum Dis 1967;26:419-25.
4. Cattalini M,Khubchandani R,CimazR.When flexibility is not necessarily a virtue: A review of hypermobility syndromes and chronic or recurrent musculoskeletal pain in children.PediatrRheumatol Online J2015;13:40.
5. Palmer S, Bailey S, Barker L, Barney L, ElliottA.The effectiveness of therapeutic exercise for joint hypermobility syndrome: A systematic review.Physiotherapy2014;100:220-7.
6. Guidelines for Management of Joint Hypermobility Syndrome in Children and Young People. A Guide for professionals managing young people with this condition.
7. Beighton P, Solomon L, Soskolne CL. Articular mobility in an African population. Ann Rheum Dis 1973;32:413-8.
8. Junge T, Jespersen E,Wedderkopp N,Juul-KristensenB.Inter-tester reproducibility and inter-method agreement of two variations of the Beighton test for determining Generalised Joint Hypermobility in primary school children.BMC Pediatr2013;13:214.
9. van Trijffel E, van de Pol RJ,Oostendorp RA, LucasC.Inter-rater reliability for measurement of passive physiological movements in lower extremity joints is generally low: A systematic review.JPhysiother2010;56:223-35.
10. Carter C, wilkinson J.Persistent joint laxity and congenital dislocation of the hip.J Bone Joint Surg Br1964;46:40-5.
11. Wynne-Davies R. Acetabular dysplasia and familial joint laxity: Two etiological factors in congenital dislocation of the hip. A review of 589 patients and their families. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1970;52:704-16.
12. Grahame R, Bird HA, ChildA.The revised (Brighton 1998) criteria for the diagnosis of benign joint hypermobility syndrome (BJHS).JRheumatol 2000;27:1777-9.

How to Cite this Article: Patel N G, Riddlestone P, Gunalan R, Gough A, Metcalfe J, Holroyd B.Reliability of Beighton’s Score in a Pediatric Population. International Journal of Paediatric Orthopaedics Jan-June 2017;3(1):9-11.

(Abstract) (Full Text HTML) (Download PDF)

Analysis of Dimeglio Score with Modified Pirani Score for Assessment of Idiopathic Clubfoot Deformity in Infants: A Comparative Study!

Volume 3 | Issue 1 | Jan-Jun 2017 | Page 2-5| Vasu sharma, Vikas Gupta, Daipayan chatterjee, Akshat Sharma

Authors : Vasu sharma [1], Vikas Gupta [2], Daipayan chatterjee [1], Akshat Sharma [1].

[1] Senior Resident, Central Institute of orthopaedics, VMMC & Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi. India.

[2] Professor, Central Institute of orthopaedics, VMMC & Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi. India.

Address of Correspondence
Dr. Vasu Sharma

Central Institute of orthopaedics,

VMMC & Safdarjung Hospital,

New Delhi 110029, India.

Email: dr.vasusharma@gmail.com

Abstract

Background: To evaluate Idiopathic clubfoot deformity of foot, several scoring systems have been proposed and modified Pirani score and Dimeglio score have stood the test of time. There is scarcity of literature comparing the two systems in depth. We tried to compare the scoring systems on user friendliness and predictability to find out whether any superiority exists, if any. We also tried out if Dimeglio score could be used as a guideline for performing tenotomy.
Methods: 82 feet of idiopathic clubfoot deformity were treated by Ponseti’s Plaster technique and evaluated by both modified Pirani and Dimeglio score simultaneously with each cast until full correction was achieved. The scores were compared using standard statistical techniques comparing predictability and user friendliness. Tenotomy was done as per guidelines given by Pirani and corresponding Dimeglio score was assessed and evaluated.
Results: Dimeglio score took longer time as compared to Modified Pirani score. Strong positive correlation was found between corresponding Modified Pirani and Dimeglio Score. Pirani score had statistical significant Plateauing just prior to tenotomy. Dimeglio score of 5 or 6 was found in all cases where tenotomy was done with Equinus score 3 or 2, Curvature of lateral border and Derotation of carpopedal block and Forefoot adduction score 0 or 1, with Cavus, Medial, Posterior crease, Muscle status score 0.
Conclusion: Both Dimeglio and Modified Pirani score have their advantages and shortcomings but most of the scoring correlate well. Dimeglio score can also be used to decide when to do tenotomy.

References

1. Turco VJ. Clubfoot: Current Problems in Orthopaedics. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1981.
2. Ponseti IV. Introduction Congenital Clubfoot: Fundamentals of Treatment. Ch. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1996. p. 1-8.
3. Stern C. Anomalies of genetic origin. Pediatrics 1950;5(2):324-328.
4. Shabtai L, Specht SC, Herzenberg JE. Worldwide spread of the Ponseti method for clubfoot. World J Orthop 2014;5(5):585-590.
5. Göksan SB. Treatment of congenital clubfoot with the Ponseti method. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2002;36(4):281-287.
6. Lehman WB, Mohaideen A, Madan S, Scher DM, Van Bosse HJ, Iannacone M, et al. A method for the early evaluation of the Ponseti (Iowa) technique for the treatment of idiopathic clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop B 2003;12(2):133-140.
7. Ponseti IV, Smoley EN. Congenital club foot: The results of treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1963;45-A:261-344.
8. Catterall A. A method of assessment of the clubfoot deformity. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991;264:48-53.
9. Diméglio A, Bensahel H, Souchet P, Mazeau P, Bonnet F. Classification of clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop B 1995;4(2):129-136.
10. Harrold AJ, Walker CJ. Treatment and prognosis in congenital club foot. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1983;65(1):8-11.
11. Canale ST, beaty JJH, Campbell’s Operative orthopedics. 12th edition. 2013. Elseviers Mosby; . Ch 29: p. 997-1001.
12. Flynn JM, Donohoe M, Mackenzie WG. An independent assessment of two clubfoot-classification systems. J Pediatr Orthop 1998;18(3):323-327.
13. Chu A, Labar AS, Sala DA, van Bosse HJ, Lehman WB. Clubfoot classification: correlation with Ponseti cast treatment. J Pediatr Orthop 2010;30(7):695-699.
14. Wainwright AM, Auld T, Benson MK, Theologis TN. The classification of congenital talipes equinovarus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002;84(7):1020-1024.
15. Cosma D, Vasilescu DE. A clinical evaluation of the pirani and dimeglio idiopathic clubfoot classifications. J Foot Ankle Surg 2015;54(4):582-585.

How to Cite this Article: Sharma V, Gupta V, Chatterjee D, Sharma A: Analysis of Dimeglio Score with Modified Pirani Score for Assessment of Idiopathic Clubfoot Deformity in Infants: A Comparative Study! International Journal of Paediatric Orthopaedics Jan-June 2017;3(1):2-5.

Half Sized Blog Element (Single Author Style)

Half Sized Blog Element (Multi Author Style)

Reliability of Beighton’s Score in a Pediatric Population

Analysis of Dimeglio Score with Modified Pirani Score for Assessment of Idiopathic Clubfoot Deformity in Infants: A Comparative Study!

Reliability of Beighton’s Score in a Pediatric Population

Analysis of Dimeglio Score with Modified Pirani Score for Assessment of Idiopathic Clubfoot Deformity in Infants: A Comparative Study!

Full Sized Blog Element (Big Preview Pic)

Reliability of Beighton’s Score in a Pediatric Population

Authors : Nimesh G Patel [1], Peter Riddlestone [1], Roshan Gunalan [1], Anthony Gough [1], James Metcalfe [1], Ben Holroyd [1].

Abstract

References

(Abstract) (Full Text HTML) (Download PDF)

Analysis of Dimeglio Score with Modified Pirani Score for Assessment of Idiopathic Clubfoot Deformity in Infants: A Comparative Study!

Authors : Vasu sharma [1], Vikas Gupta [2], Daipayan chatterjee [1], Akshat Sharma [1].

Abstract

References

(Abstract) (Full Text HTML) (Download PDF)

License

Publisher