Tag Archive for: Deformity correction

Management of Limb Deficiencies

Volume 10 | Issue 2 | May-August 2024 | Page: 48-54 | Sakti Prasad Das, Sankar Ganesh, Prateek Behera

DOI- https://doi.org/10.13107/ijpo.2024.v10.i02.194

Submitted: 11/03/2024; Reviewed: 08/04/2024; Accepted: 25/06/2024; Published: 10/08/2024

Authors: Sakti Prasad Das MS(Ortho.), DNB(PMR) [1], Sankar Ganesh MPT [2], Prateek Behera MS(Ortho.), DNB(Ortho.) [3]

[1] Medical Education & Training, DRIEMS University, Odisha, Tangi, Cuttack, Odisha, India.
[2] Department of Physiotherapy, Composite Regional Centre, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
[3] Department of Orthopaedics, AIIMS Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Address of Correspondence

Dr. Sakti Prasad Das,
Director, Medical Education & Training, DRIEMS University, Odisha, Tangi, Cuttack, Odisha, India.
E-mail: sakti2663@yahoo.com

Abstract

Limb deficiency disorders encompass a wide variety of congenital anomalies that have a significant underdevelopment or even complete absence of bones in the limbs. Treatment of these conditions must be holistic with the child at the centre. This article provides a review of the current understanding of the management of such conditions. Surgical treatment offers a practical and effective solution for treating many variants of congenital limb abnormalities. Although novel surgical treatments may expand the range of disorders that can be treated, it is crucial for both the surgeon and the family to be aware of the careful prognosis associated with the methods used. Additionally, the importance of an amputation as an option should always be kept under consideration.
Keywords: Amputation, Congenital Abnormalities, Deformity correction, Limb reconstruction, Pediatric skeletal deficiencies, Skeletal dysplasia

References

1. WHO. Congenital disorders. Geneva: WHO, 2023. Available: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/birth-defects
2. Moges N, Anley DT, Zemene MA, Adella GA, Solomon Y, Bantie B, et al. Congenital anomalies and risk factors in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ paediatrics open, 2023;7(1), e002022. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2023-002022
3. WHO. International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (ICD)-11. Geneva WHO. 2023. Available: https://www.who.int/classifications/classification-of-diseases
4. Epps CH Jr. Proximal femoral focal deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1983; 65: 867–70.
5. Kakarla S. Proximal femoral focal deficiency (PFFD) imaging spectrum. J Med Sci Res. 2015;3(2):90–93. doi: 10.17727/JMSR.2015/3-018
6. Paley D, Guardo F. Lengthening reconstruction surgery for congenital deficiency. In: Kocaoglu M, Tsuchiya H, Eralp L, editors. Advanced techniques in limb reconstruction surgery. 2014. pp. 245–298.
7. Gupta SK, Alassaf N, Harrop AR, Kiefer GN. Principles of rotationplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012;20:657–667. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-20-10-657
8. Ackman J, Altiok H, Flanagan A, Peer M, Graf A, Krzak J, et al. Long-term follow-up of Van Nes rotationplasty in patients with congenital proximal focal femoral deficiency. Bone Joint J. 2013;95-B(2):192–198. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B2.30853
9. Jones D, Barnes J, Lloyd-Roberts GC. Congenital aplasia and dysplasia of the tibia with intact fibula. Classification and management. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1978;60(1):31-39. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.60B1.627576
10. Kalamchi A., Dawe R.W. Congenital deficiency of the tibia. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. 1985;67:581–584. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.67B4.4030854
11. Weber M. New classification and score for tibia hemimelia. J Child Orthop. 2008;2:169–175.
12. Fernandez-Palazzi F, Bendahan J, Rivas S. Congenital deficiency of the tibia: a report on 22 cases. J Pediatr Orthop B. 1998;7:298–302.
13. Epps C.H., Jr., Schneider P. Treatment of hemimelias of the lower extremity. Long–term results. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. Vol. 1989;71:273–277. doi: 10.2106/00004623-198971020-00015
14. Putti V. The treatment of congenital absence of the tibia or fibula. Chir. Org. Mov. 1929;7:513.
15. Paley D. Surgical reconstruction for fibular hemimelia. J. Child. Orthop. 2016;10:557–583. doi: 10.1007/s11832-016-0790-0
16. Paley D., Robbins C. Fibular hemimelia Paley type 3. In: Rozbruch S.R., Hamdy R., editors. Limb Lengthening and Reconstruction Surgery Case Atlas. 1st ed. Springer International Publishing; Cham, Switzerland: 2015. pp. 1–8.
17. Johnson CE, Haideri NF. Comparison of functional outcome in fibular deficiency treated by limb salvage versus Syme’s amputation. In: Herring JA, Birch JG, eds. The Child With a Limb Deficiency. Rosemont: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 1998: 173–177.
18. Herzenberg J., Shabtai L, Standard SC. Fibular hemimelia: Principles and techniques of management. In: Sabharwal S., editor. Pediatric Lower Limb Deformities, Principles and Techniques of Management. 1st ed. Springer International Publishing; Cham, Switzerland: 2016. pp. 427–454.
19. Birch JG, Lincoln TL, Mack PW, et al. Congenital fibular deficiency: a review of thirty years’ experience at one institution and a proposed classification system based on clinical deformity. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:1144–1151.
20. Ali S, Kaplan S, Kaufman T, Fenerty S, Kozin S, Zlotolow DA. Madelung deformity and Madelung-type deformities: a review of the clinical and radiological characteristics. Pediatr Radiol. 2015;45(12):1856-1863. doi:10.1007/s00247-015-3390-0
21. Nielsen JB. Madelung’s deformity. A follow-up study of 26 cases and a review of the literature. Acta Orthop Scand. 1977;48(4):379-384. doi:10.3109/17453677708992012
22. Farr S, Martinez-Alvarez S, Little KJ et al (2021) The prevalence of Vickers’ ligament in Madelung’s deformity: a retrospective multicentre study of 75 surgical cases. J Hand Surg Eur. https://doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 17531 93420 981522
23. Vickers D, Nielsen G. Madelung deformity: surgical prophylaxis (physiolysis) during the late growth period by resection of the dyschondrosteosis lesion. J Hand Surg Br. 1992;17(4):401-407.
24. Laffosse JM, Abid A, Accadbled F, Knör G, de Gauzy JS, Cahuzac JP. Surgical correction of Madelung’s deformity by combined corrective radioulnar osteotomy: 14 cases with four-year minimum follow-up. IntOrthop. 2009; 33: 1655-1661.
25. Steinman S, Oishi S, Mills J, Bush P, Wheeler L, Ezaki M. Volar ligament release and distal radial dome osteotomy for the correction of Madelung deformity: long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(13):1198-1204. doi:10.2106/JBJS.L.00714
26. Colen DL, Lin IC, Levin LS, Chang B. Radial longitudinal deficiency: recent developments, controversies, and an evidence-based guide to treatment. J Hand Surg Am. 2017 Jul;42(7):546-563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.04.012
27. Bednar MS, James MA, Light TR. Congenital longitudinal deficiency. J Hand Surg Am. 2009 Nov;34(9):1739-1747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.09.002
28. Stutz C, Oishi S. Radial longitudinal deficiency: radius hypoplasia. In: Laub Jr DR, ed. Congenital Anomalies of the Upper Extremity. New York: Springer; 2015:85-94.
29. Takagi T, Seki A, Mochida J, Takayama S. Bone lengthening of the radius with temporary external fixation of the wrist for mild radial club hand. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg. 2014;67:1688e1693. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.bjps.2019.05.044
30. Buck-Gramcko D. Radialization as a new treatment for radial club hand. J. Hand Surg. Am. 1985;10(6 Pt 2):964–968. doi: 10.1016/S0363-5023(85)80013-7
31. Wall LB, Ezaki M, Oishi SN. Management of congenital radial longitudinal deficiency: controversies and current concepts. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Jul;132(1):122-128.
32. Cole RJ, Manske PR .Classification of ulnar deficiency according to the thumb and first web.. J Hand Surg Am. 1997;22:479–488.

 

How to Cite this Article:  Das SP, Ganesh S, Behera P | Management of Limb Deficiencies | International Journal of Paediatric Orthopaedics | May-August 2024; 10(2): 48-54. https://doi.org/10.13107/ijpo.2024.v10.i02.194

(Article Text HTML)      (Full Text PDF)

Basics of Paediatric Limb Reconstruction Surgeries

Volume 10 | Issue 2 | May-August 2024 | Page: 2-11 | Prateek Rastogi, Nitish Arora, Yogesh Patel 

DOI- https://doi.org/10.13107/ijpo.2024.v10.i02.182

Submitted: 18/05/2024; Reviewed: 14/06/2024; Accepted: 19/07/2024; Published: 10/08/2024

Authors: Prateek Rastogi MS Ortho [1], Nitish Arora MS Ortho [2], Yogesh Patel MS Ortho [3]

[1] Department of Orthopaedics, Sharda Hospital, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.
[2] Department of Orthopaedics, Medicover Hospital, Khargar, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
[3] Department of Orthopaedics, Sagar Multispeciality Hospital, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Address of Correspondence

Dr. Prateek Rastogi,
Paediatric Orthopaedics and Limb Reconstruction Surgeon, Department of Orthopaedics, Sharda Hospital, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.
E-mail: prateek.rastogi12@gmail.com

Abstract

Paediatric limb reconstruction surgeries play a pivotal role in managing congenital and acquired deformities, limb length discrepancies, and complex musculoskeletal disorders in children. These procedures aim to restore alignment, function, and length while preserving growth potential and minimizing long-term disability. Unlike adult cases, paediatric reconstructions demand unique considerations due to ongoing skeletal development, necessitating precise planning to avoid growth plate damage. This review outlines the evolving indications for reconstruction—including congenital conditions like various hemimelia and bony deficiency, as well as acquired deformities from trauma, infection, and tumors. Foundational principles such as anatomical and mechanical axes and their deviation, CORA (Center of Rotation of Angulation), and ACA (Angulation Correction Axis) are discussed alongside osteotomy planning and execution. Techniques of gradual deformity correction such as growth modulation, and distraction osteogenesis are examined in depth, highlighting the roles of devices like Ilizarov fixators, hexapods, and intramedullary lengthening nails. Recent advancements in imaging, surgical planning, and implant design have significantly improved outcomes, although complications such as joint stiffness, infection, and secondary deformities persist. With increasing precision and a growing array of tools, paediatric limb reconstruction continues to evolve, offering promising outcomes and functional restoration to affected children.
Keywords: Paediatric limb reconstruction, Deformity Correction, Limb Lengthening, Growth Modulation, Distraction Osteogenesis, Osteotomy Techniques

References

1. Hosny GA. Limb lengthening history, evolution, complications and current concepts. J Orthop Traumatol. 2020;21(1):3. doi:10.1186/s10195-019-0541-3
2. Greenberg LA. Genu Varum and Genu Valgum: Another Look. Am J Dis Child. 1971;121(3):219. doi:10.1001/archpedi.1971.02100140085006
3. Kim TG, Park MS, Lee SH, et al. Leg-length discrepancy and associated risk factors after paediatric femur shaft fracture: A multicentre study. Journal of Children’s Orthopaedics. 2021;15(3):215-222. doi:10.1302/1863-2548.15.200252
4. Popkov A, Dučić S, Lazović M, Lascombes P, Popkov D. Limb lengthening and deformity correction in children with abnormal bone. Injury. 2019;50:S79-S86. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2019.03.045
5. Nasto LA, Coppa V, Riganti S, et al. Clinical results and complication rates of lower limb lengthening in paediatric patients using the PRECICE 2 intramedullary magnetic nail: a multicentre study. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics B. 2020;29(6):611-617. doi:10.1097/BPB.0000000000000651
6. Radler C, Calder P, Eidelman M, et al. What’s new in pediatric lower limb reconstruction? Journal of Children’s Orthopaedics. 2024;18(4):349-359. doi:10.1177/18632521241258351
7. Calder PR, Faimali M, Goodier WD. The role of external fixation in paediatric limb lengthening and deformity correction. Injury. 2019;50:S18-S23. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2019.03.049
8. Guarniero R, Barros Júnior TE. Femoral lengthening by the Wagner method. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;(250):154-159.
9. Ilizarov GA. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues. Part I. The influence of stability of fixation and soft-tissue preservation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;(238):249-281.
10. Ilizarov GA. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: Part II. The influence of the rate and frequency of distraction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;(239):263-285.
11. Socci AR, Horn D, Fornari ED, Lakra A, Schulz JF, Sharkey MS. What’s New in Pediatric Limb Lengthening and Deformity Correction? Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. 2020;40(7):e598-e602. doi:10.1097/BPO.0000000000001456
12. Boero S, Riganti S, Marrè Brunenghi G, Nasto LA. Hexapod External Fixators in Paediatric Deformities. In: Massobrio M, Mora R, eds. Hexapod External Fixator Systems. Springer International Publishing; 2021:133-152. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-40667-7_8
13. Georgiadis AG, Rossow JK, Laine JC, Iobst CA, Dahl MT. Plate-assisted Lengthening of the Femur and Tibia in Pediatric Patients. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. 2017;37(7):473-478. doi:10.1097/BPO.0000000000000645
14. Iobst C. Advances in Pediatric Limb Lengthening: Part 1. JBJS Rev. 2015;3(8). doi:10.2106/JBJS.RVW.N.00101
15. Iobst C. Advances in Pediatric Limb Lengthening: Part 2. JBJS Rev. 2015;3(9). doi:10.2106/JBJS.RVW.N.00102
16. Paley D. Problems, obstacles, and complications of limb lengthening by the Ilizarov technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;(250):81-104.
17. Shabtai L, Specht SC, Standard SC, Herzenberg JE. Internal Lengthening Device for Congenital Femoral Deficiency and Fibular Hemimelia. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(12):3860-3868. doi:10.1007/s11999-014-3572-3
18. Fuller CB, Shannon CE, Paley D. Lengthening Reconstruction Surgery for Fibular Hemimelia: A Review. Children (Basel). 2021;8(6):467. doi:10.3390/children8060467
19. Chong DY, Paley D. Deformity Reconstruction Surgery for Tibial Hemimelia. Children (Basel). 2021;8(6):461. doi:10.3390/children8060461
20. Paley D. Paley Cross-Union Protocol for Treatment of Congenital Pseudarthrosis of the Tibia. Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics. 2021;31(2):100881. doi:10.1016/j.oto.2021.100881
21. Gaber K, Mir B, Shehab M, Kishta W. Updates in the Surgical Management of Recurrent Clubfoot Deformity: a Scoping Review. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2022;15(2):75-81. doi:10.1007/s12178-022-09739-6
22. Qin S, Zang J, Wang Y, Jiao S, Qin X, Pan Q. Traumatic Sequelae of Lower Limb. In: Qin S, Zang J, Jiao S, Pan Q, eds. Lower Limb Deformities. Springer Singapore; 2020:433-470. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-9604-5_10
23. Belthur MV, Esparza M, Fernandes JA, Chaudhary MM. Post Infective Deformities: Strategies for Limb Reconstruction. In: Belthur MV, Ranade AS, Herman MJ, Fernandes JA, eds. Pediatric Musculoskeletal Infections. Springer International Publishing; 2022:411-493. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-95794-0_23
24. Nagarajan R, Neglia JP, Clohisy DR, Robison LL. Limb Salvage and Amputation in Survivors of Pediatric Lower-Extremity Bone Tumors: What Are the Long-Term Implications? JCO. 2002;20(22):4493-4501. doi:10.1200/JCO.2002.09.006
25. Chan G, Miller F. Assessment and Treatment of Children with Cerebral Palsy. Orthopedic Clinics of North America. 2014;45(3):313-325. doi:10.1016/j.ocl.2014.03.003
26. Lamm BM, Paley D. Deformity correction planning for hindfoot, ankle, and lower limb. Clinics in Podiatric Medicine and Surgery. 2004;21(3):305-326. doi:10.1016/j.cpm.2004.04.004
27. Çakmak M, Şen C, Eralp L, Balci HI, Civan M, eds. Basic Techniques for Extremity Reconstruction. Springer International Publishing; 2018. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45675-1
28. Paley D, Herzenberg JE, Tetsworth K, McKie J, Bhave A. Deformity Planning for Frontal and Sagittal Plane Corrective Osteotomies. Orthopedic Clinics of North America. 1994;25(3):425-465. doi:10.1016/S0030-5898(20)31927-1
29. Paley D. Principles of Deformity Correction. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2002. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-59373-4
30. Farr S, Mindler G, Ganger R, Girsch W. Bone Lengthening in the Pediatric Upper Extremity. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2016;98(17):1490-1503. doi:10.2106/JBJS.16.00007
31. Thomas A, Round J. Basic principles of lower limb deformity correction. Surgery (Oxford). 2023;41(4):255-261. doi:10.1016/j.mpsur.2023.02.015
32. Madhuri V, Reddy J. Acute Deformity Correction Using an Osteotomy. In: Sabharwal S, Iobst CA, eds. Pediatric Lower Limb Deformities. Springer International Publishing; 2024:117-150. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-55767-5_8
33. Hubbard EW, Cherkashin A, Samchukov M, Podeszwa D. The Evolution of Guided Growth for Lower Extremity Angular Correction. Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America. 2023;5(3):738. doi:10.55275/JPOSNA-2023-738
34. Metaizeau JD, Denis D, Louis D. New femoral derotation technique based on guided growth in children. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2019;105(6):1175-1179. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2019.06.005
35. Horn J, Steen H, Huhnstock S, Hvid I, Gunderson RB. Limb lengthening and deformity correction of congenital and acquired deformities in children using the Taylor Spatial Frame. Acta Orthopaedica. 2017;88(3):334-340. doi:10.1080/17453674.2017.1295706
36. Karpinski MR, Newton G, Henry AP. The results and morbidity of varus osteotomy for Perthes’ disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;(209):30-40.
37. Kanaujia RR, Ikuta Y, Muneshige H, Higaki T, Shimogaki K. Dome osteotomy for cubitus varus in children. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. 1988;59(3):314-317. doi:10.3109/17453678809149371
38. Nelitz M. Femoral Derotational Osteotomies. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2018;11(2):272-279. doi:10.1007/s12178-018-9483-2
39. Tennant JN, Carmont M, Phisitkul P. Calcaneus osteotomy. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2014;7(4):271-276. doi:10.1007/s12178-014-9237-8.

How to Cite this Article:  Rastogi P, Arora N, Patel Y| Basics of Paediatric Limb Reconstruction Surgeries| International Journal of Paediatric Orthopaedics | May-August 2024; 10(2): 02-11. https://doi.org/10.13107/ijpo.2024.v10.i02.182

(Article Text HTML)      (Full Text PDF)