Blog Elements - International Journal of Paediatric Orthopaedics

Half Sized Blog Element (Single Author Style)

Half Sized Blog Element (Multi Author Style)

Dorso-Lateral Wedge correction osteotomy: Is this the way forward?

Volume 2 | Issue 1 | Jan-Apr 2016 | Page 19-22|Viraj U Shingade1 Authors :Viraj U Shingade[1] Children Orthopaedic Care Institute and Pravira Hospital Daya chambers, Wardha road , Nagpur, Maharashtra. Address of Correspondence Dr Viraj U Shingade Children Orthopaedic Care Institute and Pravira Hospital Daya chambers, Beside Haldiram Building, Ajani square, Wardha road. Nagpur, […]

Use of Illizarov Technique in correction of complex Clubfoot

Volume 2 | Issue 1 | Jan-Apr 2016 | Page 10-18|Ruta Kulkarni1, Rajiv Negandhi1 Authors :Ruta Kulkarni[1], Rajiv Negandhi[1] Dept of Orthopaedics, Post Graduate Institute of Swasthiyog Pratishthan, Miraj, Maharashtra. Address of Correspondence Dr Ruta Kulkarni Dept of Orthopaedics, Post Graduate Institute of Swasthiyog Pratishthan, Miraj, Maharashtra, India Email: rutam@gmail.com Abstract Neglected and recurrent clubfoot […]

Dorso-Lateral Wedge correction osteotomy: Is this the way forward?

Use of Illizarov Technique in correction of complex Clubfoot

Full Sized Blog Element (Big Preview Pic)

Dorso-Lateral Wedge correction osteotomy: Is this the way forward?

Volume 2 | Issue 1 | Jan-Apr 2016 | Page 19-22|Viraj U Shingade1

Authors :Viraj U Shingade[1]

Children Orthopaedic Care Institute and Pravira Hospital Daya chambers, Wardha road , Nagpur, Maharashtra.

Address of Correspondence
Dr Viraj U Shingade
Children Orthopaedic Care Institute and Pravira Hospital Daya chambers, Beside Haldiram Building, Ajani square, Wardha road. Nagpur, Maharashtra-440015.
Email: virajshingade@rediffmail.com

Abstract

In the present era of more and more advancements, when we are talking about mini invasive procedures, developing countries are still facing the major burden of neglected clubfoot deformities; where children present to orthopaedic surgeon at 5-18 years of age, not treated in the past. The orthopaedic surgeon to whom they present is in great dilemma about how to treat these cases. Majority of children cannot afford surgical procedures like Ilizarov which need expensive implants, and frequent visits to the specialised centres. Patients usually ask for one-time procedure which will give them the best chance of cure since they are brought for the treatment by charitable agencies or social workers. Dilemma in choosing correct method of treatment for these neglected or relapsed feet led to the evolution of a new single-staged, simpler and effective technique of dorso-lateral wedge corrective osteotomy. The procedure has been extensively studied in neglected as well as relapsed cases of club feet with long term follow up of more than 10 years. This review briefly describes the technical details of the procedure.
Keywords: Clubfoot, Club feet, Neglected, Relapsed, Osteotomy, Ponseti.

Introduction
The Need for new surgical technique: In the present era of more and more advancements, when we are talking about mini invasive procedures, developing countries are still facing the major burden of neglected clubfoot deformities; where children present to orthopaedic surgeon at 5-18 years of age, not treated in the past. These children walk on dorsum or dorso-lateral aspect of foot (Figure 1). They cannot use normal shoe-wear and are prone for injuries while playing games and walking long distances. They get repeated wounds at callosities, formed over dorsum of foot. They also have difficulty in squatting, which is the commonest position, used for day-to-day activities including toileting. Social stigma of having reversed feet is an important factor as such children are avoided by friends and girls experience problems in getting married.
The orthopaedic surgeon to whom they present is in great dilemma about how to treat these cases. Majority of children cannot afford surgical procedures like Ilizarov[1] which need expensive implants, and frequent visits to the specialised centres. Patients usually ask for one-time procedure which will give them the best chance of cure since they are brought for the treatment by charitable agencies or social workers.
Extensive soft tissue releases in these cases, pose problems of skin approximation, wound healing and scarring[1, 2, 3]. Conventional bony procedures cannot fully correct these severe deformities and combination of multiple procedures is required[1,2,3,4,5,6]. Triple arthrodesis[5] is associated with stiffness and ankle arthritis. Ponseti’s method for managing neglected cases have problems of compliance, frequent visits for plastering, expenses involved and subsequent need of osteotomies[7,8,9] to get complete correction.
Dilemma in choosing correct method of treatment for these neglected or relapsed feet due to above reasons led to the evolution of a new single-staged, simpler and effective technique of dorso-lateral wedge corrective osteotomy. The aim was not to obtain a normal anatomical foot; but to obtain a foot which is more or less plantigrade and able to fit shoes. A longitudinal follow up study was conducted by our institute to measure the outcome of this procedure in neglected as well as relapsed clubfoot deformities. The study was published [10] in the year 2012 with good follow up of cases and in fact now we have follow up more than 10 years of majority of our cases. Subsequently we found that the procedure was equally useful for neglected and relapsed cases of clubfoot associated with myelomeningocele and it was published[11] in the year 2014.

Operative Technique
The details of the operative technique are described in the published article in Journal Current Orthopaedic Practice [10] in the year 2012. The technique in brief is as follows: Under epidural anesthesia, the patient is placed supine; after painting and draping, the tourniquet is inflated. For correction of the cavus deformity, a percutaneous plantar fasciotomy is done (Figure 2A) from the medial aspect of the sole. The foot is then stretched manually to confirm complete release of plantar fascia. To correct the equinus, percutaneous Achilles complete transverse tenotomy (Figure 2B) is done and foot is stretched (dorsiflexed) manually. The Achilles tenotomy unlocks the heel, correcting equinus as well as heel varus. In rare cases of relapsed deformity if equinus is not corrected completely, the posterior ankle capsular release can be done through same incision. Attention is then directed to the dorsal closing wedge osteotomy. An elliptical skin incision is made on the dorso-lateral aspect at the apex of the deformed foot (Figure 2C).The incision extends from the lateral border of the foot to just short of the medial border. The elliptical skin and preformed bursa are excised. All dorsal musculature is separated and preserved with a periosteal elevator and chisel and then retracted. The dorsal neurovascular bundles are protected. The osteotomy is marked with an osteotome at the apex of the deformed foot. The wedge should be wider dorsally (1-2 cm) and taper towards the sole (Figure 2D). The amount of bony wedge required depends on the severity of the deformity. A rough clinical guide that can be used is that children who walk on the lateral border of the foot usually do not require more than 1-1.5cm of wedge; those who walk on the dorsum of foot may need more than 1.5cm of wedge. One can always remove additional bone if the correction is found to be inadequate. This also prevents the over-correction. The bones included in wedge are cuboid and all three cuneiforms. Occasionally, the navicular or distal calcaneus or base of the metatarsals may require osteotomy, depending on the severity of the deformity. Occasionally impingement of the navicular against the head of the talus occurs, not allowing full correction of the deformity, even with cuboid and cuneiform osteotomy. In those patients, naviculectomy should be done, and sometimes an additional terminal portion of the talar head may need to be excised, taking care not to disturb the subtalar joint. After wedge removal, care is taken to remove cartilage from the osteotomy bed and approximating edges to prevent nonunion and pseudarthrosis. No attempt is made to touch the subtalar joint. The deformity is then corrected by closing the space manually by everting and dorsiflexing the foot and by approximating the bony surfaces, as if closing an open book (Figures 2E and F). The forefoot is stabilized to the hindfoot with three Kirschner-wires passed from the metatarsals to the calcaneus(Figure 2G). Cancellous bone from the resected wedge is grafted at the osteotomy site. No attempt is made to look for radiographic correction because judgement is clinical. The wound is closed after placing a drain (Figure 2G) and the tourniquet is deflated. An above-knee cast was applied. A window was made in the cast (Figure 2I), and the limb was kept elevated on pillows.
Three days of intravenous antibiotics are given along with an epidural for pain relief. On the third postoperative day, the wound is inspected through the window in the cast
(Figure 2I). Hematoma, if present, should be removed along with the drain. Patients are discharged on the fourth postoperative day and non-weight bearing is advised for 6 weeks. After 6 weeks, the Kirschner-wires and cast are removed, and a plastic molded ankle-foot orthosis is applied to be worn for 6 months. Squatting is encouraged at home.
The foot deformities were graded according to classification system described by Dimeglio [12] and the results of the surgical procedure were studied extensively using evaluation system described by International Clubfoot Study group and Bensahel [13].

Discussion
Here we are not discussing about Dimeglio grade I or II deformities. We are discussing the neglected cases who have Dimeglio-grade III/IV deformities and who have came for the treatment at 5 yrs of age or later. Also we are discussing about patients with relapsed clubfeet in developing countries who present late to the hospital and may have been operated on at hospitals where no experts were available. Hence, at the time of presentation, they usually have severe (Dimeglio-grade III/IV) deformities that cannot be corrected with conventional procedures such as those described by Dwyer or Dillwyn Evans alone, and a combination of procedures[14,15,16] is required.
With the described technique, excellent and good results were achieved in 89.6% feet at our centre; indicating that the technique is effective and extremely useful in both relapsed as well as neglected clubfeet (Figure 3 and 4). When we compared the results of neglected feet and relapsed feet we found that the results were better in neglected feet. The lower proportion of excellent and good results in relapsed feet compared with neglected feet could be from scarring of previous surgeries with resultant stiffness at the ankle, subtalar, or mid tarsal joints. This was consistent [16,17,18] with other studies. We also found that the results were better in younger (<10 years) children due to less bony incongruency and better ability to remodel.
Bones in these feet are so deformed that they cannot achieve normal radiographic relationships. Our results were independent of radiographic findings and were consistent with other [18,19] studies. Only one child with poor results (bilateral relapsed feet) had complete correction of the deformity intraoperatively but was lost to follow-up for 59 months. The patient neither performed squatting exercises nor used splints, leading to recurrence. This suggests that squatting has an important role to play. In spite of poor results, he maintained good function.
No feet (including those with poor results) had clinical or radiographic evidence of arthritis at the ankle or any other joint in last 10 years of follow-up. A possible reason could be that our procedure preserves the subtalar joint. This is an advantage over triple5 arthrodesis.
Patients usually have foot discomfort and plantar pain during the initial few months after cast removal. This is due to sensitivity of the sole and disuse osteoporosis of the calcaneus and metatarsals. None of the patients complained pain during follow-up, which might be attributed to good fusion at the osteotomy site with the use of cancellous grafting.
Clubfoot is a three-dimensional deformity, with a contracted tendo-Achilles being the main deforming force. Achilles tenotomy unlocks the heel and corrects equines and heel varus. No separate procedure or calcaneal osteotomy is necessary for varus correction (Figures 2 H).
With the described technique one can achieve good correction of all components intra-operatively (Figures 2 G, H) and can have varus-valgus movements on the table. Meticulous preservation of dorsal structures preserves function and prevents wound complications.
In bilateral cases, we advice surgery on both feet under a single anesthesia; which reduces the rehabilitation time, saves resources, and provides a unique opportunity for correction. This single-stage surgical procedure is easy, safe, and reproducible, and it can be performed with basic orthopaedic instruments.
There are no rigid criteria about specific bones to be osteotomized. If the surgeon performs an osteotomy at the apex of a deformed foot and takes out a wedge dorsally, tapering towards the sole, no error can occur.
There is no risk of neurovascular damage. By removing a dorsal wedge, tension in the system is released. Problems of medial scarring and wound breakdown are avoided because the technique is percutaneous medially. No iliac crest graft or major implants are required. Fewer follow-ups are required than with other techniques. We believe that the technique is cost effective, requiring only 10% of the cost involved in the Ilizarov or other techniques. The only disadvantage is possible shortening of foot length in unilateral cases. We observed an average shortening of 1.18cm which is comparable to other series of bony procedures and even those feet treated[19,20,21] conservatively.
We agree that the best approach in developing countries to reduce the load of neglected cases and to avoid long-term problems associated with extensive soft-tissue releases is early[21] intervention during infancy. This can be achieved by seeking help from paramedical persons like nurses or physiotherapists to use the Ponseti technique[21,22] at outlying hospitals, but until that time this load of neglected cases persists;the described technique provides a good alternative procedure to surgeons of the developing world. It is a good alternative to conventional procedures for management of neglected or relapsed, late presenting clubfoot deformities. We do not claim that this is the only best alternative, but it may suit the needs of developing countries, particularly in settings like ours, where patients mostly of low socioeconomic means come from remote villages and are unable to comply in terms of follow-up

References

1. Penny JN. The neglected clubfoot. Techniques in Orthopaedics Vol 20. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Inc.; 2005: 153–166.
2. Kumar PNH, Laing PW, Klenerman L. Medial calcaneal osteotomy for relapsed equinovarus deformity: long term study of the results of Frederick Dwyer. J Bone Joint Surg. 1993; 75-B: 967–971.
3. Yamamoto H, Muneta T, Ishibashi T, et al. Posteromedial release of congenital club foot in children over five years of age. J Bone Joint Surg. 1994; 76-B:555–558.
4. Uglow MG, Clarke NMP. Relapse in staged surgery for congenital talipes equinovarus. J Bone Joint Surg. 2000; 82-B: 739–743.
5. Pell RF, Myerson MS, Schon LC. Clinical outcome after primary triple arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg. 2000; 82-A:47–57.
6. Legaspi J, Li YH, Chow W, et al. Talectomy in patients with recurrent deformity in club foot: a long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg. 2001; 83-B:384–387.
7. Lourenco AF, Morcuende JA. Correction of neglected idiopathic club foot by the Ponseti method. J Bone Joint Surg. 2007; 89- B:378–381.
8. Nogueira MP, Batlle AME, Alves CM. Is it possible to treat recurrent clubfoot with the Ponseti technique after posteromedial release?: a preliminary study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009; 467:1298–1305.
9. Culverwell AD, Tapping CR. Congenital talipes equinovarus in Papua New Guinea: a difficult yet potentially manageable situation. Int Orthop. 2007; 33:521–526.
10. Shingade V, Shingade R, Ughade S.Correction of neglected or relapsed clubfoot deformity in an older child by single staged procedure-early results-Curr. Orthop. Practice 2012; 23(2),122-129.
11. Shingade V, Shingade R, Ughade S Single-stage correction for clubfoot associated withmyelomeningocele in older children: early results Curr. Orthop. Practice 2014;25(1),64-70.
12. Dimeglio A, Bensahel H, Souchet P, et al. Classification of clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop B. 1995; 4-B:129–136.
13. Bensahel H, Kuo K, Duhaime MInternational Clubfoot Study Group Outcome evaluation of the treatment of clubfoot: the international language of clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2003; 12- B:269–271.
14. Wilson HA. Bone operations for the correction of club-foot, based upon an analysis of 435 operations by 108 operators. J Bone Joint Surg. 1894; S1-6:159–194.
15. Dekel S, Weissman SL. Osteotomy of the calcaneus and concomitant plantar stripping in children with talipes cavovarus. J Bone Joint Surg. 1973; 55-B:802–808.
16. Tayton K, Thompson P. Relapsing club feet: late results of delayed operation. J Bone Joint Surg. 1979; 61-B:474–480.
17. Addison A, Fixsen JA, Lloyd-Roberts GC. A review of the Dillwyn Evans type collateral operation in severe club feet. J Bone Joint Surg. 1983; 65-B:12–14.
18. Graham GP, Dent CM. Dillwyn Evans operation for relapsed club foot: long term results. J Bone Joint Surg. 1992; 74-B: 445–448.
19. Laaveg SJ, Ponseti IV. Long term results of treatment of club foot. J Bone Joint Surg. 1980; 62-A:23–31.
20. Wynne-Davies R. Talipes equinovarus: a review of eighty—four cases after completion of treatment. J Bone Joint Surg. 1964; 46- B:464–476.
21. Dobbs MB, Nunley R, Schoenecker PL. Long-term follow-up of patients with clubfeet treated with extensive soft-tissue release. J Bone Joint Surg. 2006; 88-A:986–996.
22. Janicki JA, Narayanan UG, Harvey BJ, et al. Comparison of surgeon and physiotherapist-directed Ponseti treatment of idiopathic clubfoot. J Bone Joint Surg. 2009; 91-A:1101–1108.

How to Cite this Article:Shingade VU. “Dorso-Lateral Wedge correction osteotomy: Is this the way forward?”. International Journal of Paediatric Orthopaedics Jan-April 2016;2(1):19-22.

(Abstract) (Full Text HTML) (Download PDF)

Use of Illizarov Technique in correction of complex Clubfoot

Volume 2 | Issue 1 | Jan-Apr 2016 | Page 10-18|Ruta Kulkarni1, Rajiv Negandhi1

Authors :Ruta Kulkarni[1], Rajiv Negandhi[1]

Dept of Orthopaedics, Post Graduate Institute of Swasthiyog Pratishthan, Miraj, Maharashtra.

Address of Correspondence
Dr Ruta Kulkarni
Dept of Orthopaedics, Post Graduate Institute of Swasthiyog Pratishthan, Miraj, Maharashtra, India
Email: rutam@gmail.com

Abstract

Neglected and recurrent clubfoot present with two primary types of deformities namely dynamic deformities and rigid deformities. Soft tissue tightness cause dynamic deformities while bony elements leads to rigid deformities. Deformity correction in cases of clubfoot with ilizarov frame works well if principles of deformity correction are followed well. Dynamic deformity can be stretched out well with soft tissue distraction, while rigid deformity will require bony procedure. Ring fixators can achieve painless, functional plantigrade foot with minimal complications, however patient compliance and acceptability are practical issues. This article reviews various clinical scenarios and provides a detailed management plan using ring fixators.
Keywords: Ilizarov ring fixator, clubfoot, osteotomy, distraction histiogenesis

Introduction
In most children conventional surgical management of idiopathic clubfoot gives good results, but a recurrent deformity requiring further operation may occur. In 10-15 % of children, its treatment depends upon the nature and severity of the foot. A foot which is supple may require recasting or dynamic transfer of tibialis anterior. A rigid foot is likely to require repeated soft tissue procedures and sometimes bony procedures in form of lateral column shortening and calcaneal osteotomy .This can make foot more stiff and shorten already short foot. An alternative is to use the Illizarov technique. Application of this external fixator allows gradual distraction of joints and correction of all aspects of the deformity.
Foot deformities can be corrected by: (1) Soft tissue distraction, and (2) osteotomy distraction by Ilizarov method. Ilizarov apparatus is best suited for complex three-dimensional correction of foot deformities. The foot has multiple joints functioning in different directions with different axis of rotation. When the osteotomy is distracted wedge type of new regenerate bone is formed, correcting the deformity.

Principle of Deformity Correction
Paley has laid down the principles of deformity correction in the book “Principles of Deformity Correction” Springer-Verlag[1,2]. The deformities of the foot are corrected on two principles as promulgated by Ilizarov. Principle of tension stress which states that gradual traction on living tissues stimulates tissue genesis and growth throughout the distraction period. The second principle is the shape forming processes acting upon bone tissue are dependent upon the magnitude of the applied load and the adequacy of blood supply. An increase in the pressure load on a supply to that region results in bone atrophy. If however, the increased load is accompanied by adequate blood supply, the bone hypertrophies according to Wolf’s law remains normal[3,4].

Conventional Surgery
Conventional surgery in most cases has given excellent results and is definitely indicated in uncomplicated cases of foot deformities. The conventional procedures for correction of deformities are: (1) tendon transfers, (2) tendon lengthening, (3) arthrodesis, (4) osteotomies, and (5) soft tissue release.
There are many complications of the conventional operations: (1) the surgery may cause shortening of the foot which is already shorter because of the paralysis, deformity or lack of blood supply, (2) infection may occur which may cause further deformity, (3) pseudarthrosis may occur, (4) the osteotomy may not unite and may cause further stiffness of an already stiff joint, (5) if there is infection, conventional surgery may be associated with complications of osteomyelitis, arthrodesis may occur, and (6) recurrence of deformity is known[5,6].

The Advantages of Ilizarov Method
It is a minimally invasive procedure with minimal dissection, and therefore, decreased risk of neurovascular and soft tissue injury and infection.
This is particularly advantageous in the multiply operated foot.
The Ilizarov method is also not limited by the magnitude of the deformity. Even very severe deformities can be treated by this method.
It allows a comprehensive approach to foot deformity correction by treating not only the foot deformity, but also the associated tibial deformities; leg and foot length discrepancies and even the thin calf can be widened.
Another important advantage is any residual deformity after surgery can be corrected during the postoperative period. It is adjustable even after an acute correction is performed. Achieving a perfectly plantigrade foot in the operating room, whether with an osteotomy or an arthrodesis, is difficult. With the circular external fixator it is possible to obtain the desired correction either acutely in the operation room or gradually after operation.
Non-osteotomy treatment may still be considered in the presence of fixed bony deformity if limited arthrodesis are planned to maintain the correction that is obtained by joint distraction. This reduces the amount of bone that needs to be resected at the time of arthrodesis.4

Disadvantages of Ilizarov Method
Ilizarov method is associated with many complications especially in the foot, because foot has a large number of small joints and axes. Axis of rotation of each joint is different from other joints,
The pain factor: Most of the patients do complain of pain.
The treatment period is lengthy with prolonged joint immobilization. Functional loading, however, including full weight bearing as tolerated, is permitted during treatment. This helps to counteract effects of the prolonged joint immobilization.

Strategies
There are two strategies of Ilizarov method to correct the foot deformity: (1) soft tissue distraction with or without surgical release of the soft tissue. (2) Bony distraction by osteotomy. In this strategy, the distraction occurs through osteotomies, regenerating new bone and eliminating deformities by opening wedge-type corrections.7 The joints remain undisturbed with osteotomy distraction techniques.
The strategy depends on: (1) the age of the patient, (2) the presence of bony deformities—here the deformity is corrected by distracting across joints in an attempt to bring them into a new congruous relationship to a plantigrade position, and (3) the stiffness of the foot.(4) Presence of arthrodesis.

Indications for Soft Tissue and Osteotomy Distraction (Fig 1. & 2)
Paley has given the following guidelines:
Age is an important consideration in deciding non-osteotomy or osteotomy treatment.
According to Paley, non-osteotomy should be done in children below 8 years of age. The deformed foot can be corrected by a soft tissue distraction in children below the age of 8 years. In this group, shape of the foot bones can get remodeled. Soft tissue distraction relies on biologic plasticity of cartilaginous bones. This capability is unreliable in older patients. Cartilage fills the incongruities. During the postoperative period, distraction induces reshaping of bones by activation of the circumferential physis of these bones, leading to a new congruous alignment of the foot bones. The bones adapt to the new position
Adolescents and adults: An older patient with no bony deformity but a soft tissue contracture leading to cavus, equinus, varus, etc. is a good candidate for the soft tissue distraction. If the bones of the foot are congruous only soft tissue distraction can correct the deformity, irrespective of age.
Stiffness of the joint is an important consideration in decision making. When soft tissue distraction is to be done, if the joint is very stiff, there is significant risk of physeal disruption rather than joint distraction. In these cases osteotomy is preferable. Therefore, it is better to grade the stiffness. The author has graded the stiffness into three types: Mild, moderate and severe. Mild grade has a mobile foot, which can be brought to normal foot position from the deformed position. In moderate stiffness, deformed foot is corrected from the deformed position to 30° away from the normal position. In severe stiffness, foot is fixed at 30° or more. Mild and moderate stiffness can be corrected by a soft tissue distraction. Severe degree of stiffness needs osteotomy.
In very stiff deformities, especially as a result of multiple previous surgical attempts, osteotomy should be considered, despite the young age. One contraindication to soft tissue distraction is the presence of limited or extensive arthrodesis. These cases obviously require osteotomy. The soft tissue technique depends on the ability to distract them through multiple joints simultaneously. If these joints are already arthrodesed, this is no longer possible. Thus, the contraindications for soft tissue distraction are: (1) incongruity of the joints after the age of eight, (2) severe stiffness of the foot, and (3) arthrodesis of joints.
Recurrence of a deformity after Ilizarov frame removal is rare in bony corrections (osteotomy), but is common in soft tissue distraction technique, usually due to neurovascular imbalance. An osteotomy in such patients provides a lasting correction through bone instead of joints. Therefore, it is important to consider judicious use of adjunctive muscle balancing surgery (tendon lengthening or transfer) to maintain the correction obtained by the Ilizarov soft tissue method. In many cases, tendon lengthening is done at the time of the Ilizarov frame application.8 Casts are applied immediately on removal of the apparatus, and orthotics is often used long-term to maintain correction.
There are two systems of ilizarov construct to correct the foot deformities: (1) constrained system, and (2) unconstrained system.

In the consConstrained System ( Fig 3A & B)(Fig 4 A&B)trained system, hinges are used so that the movement occurs in one direction only, in the plane of the hinges. It is necessary to find the instant center of rotation of the joint and to perform the correction around this single center of rotation. The advantage in the constrained system is one can mobilize the joint, e.g. in an equinus deformity, the ankle joint can be mobilized with a hinge at the center of rotation of ankle joint. The center of the rotation of ankle is in the lateral facet of the talus in line with the sinus tarsi. While doing the ankle movements, the posterior distraction rod between tibia and hindfoot is removed. This system is particularly applicable to joints such as elbow, knee, ankle and wrist.
According to Grant the constrained system, which is the rule in most other areas of the body, is less applicable to the foot and ankle. When used, it usually corrects a deformity in one plane. The motions of the foot and ankle, however, are usually more complex, most occur through multiple joints and are three dimensional. Thus, a less constrained system has been developed in which the joints of the foot and ankle become the hinges used for correction. Universal hinges are placed on one side of the deformity, and a pulling or pushing device (the motor) is placed on the opposite side. The correction occurs through the joints between the hinge and the motor. If it is desired that the correction of a particular deformity should occur through a specific joint or point, constraints are placed in the system. This is done by positioning olive wires to force a motion to occur on one side or the other of the olive, thus, the place that the movement occurs is controlled.
The constrained system, on the other hand, has to be very precise, and the hinges must be aligned to the joint axis within a narrow range of tolerance to avoid jumping of the joints. In the unconstrained system, it allows the contracture to correct itself around soft tissue hinges and natural axes of rotation of joints. Incorrect hinge placement can also inadvertently lead to joint compression or subluxation or even dislocation. The unconstrained method is advantageous for the treatment of the multiple foot joints that do not have a known simple single axis of rotation and is less advantageous for the treatment of joints such as the ankle, which do have an easy-to-locate axis.

Unconstrained System (Fig.5)
In the unconstrained system, one allows the contracture to correct itself around soft tissue hinges and natural axes of rotation of joints. The advantage of the unconstrained system is that it is simpler to apply and more forgiving.
Treatment of Equinus Deformity
Equinus deformity can be treated by constrained or unconstrained method. Axis of rotation of the ankle lies approximately at the level of the lateral process of the talus. Its axis extends laterally through the tip of the lateral malleolus, and medially below the tip of the medial malleolus.

Constrained Method
The image intensifier is used to locate the axis of rotation of the ankle. Preoperatively, Mose circles are applied to a true lateral image of the ankle to identify the level of the axis of rotation. The center is usually within the lateral process of the talus. The image intensifier is used to obtain a true lateral image of the ankle such that the lateral malleolus is centered over the midlateral tibia. A wire is used to point to the center of rotation. Once the wire overlaps the region of the lateral process, this spot is marked on the skin. The same process should be repeated for both the medial and lateral sides. The image intensifier must be perpendicular to the tibia.
Step 1: Apply a preconstructed two-level frame to the tibia. Use four wires to fix the tibial frame to the leg. The author uses one half pin at 90° to the medial face wire.
Step 2: Suspend hinges from threaded rods off the distal tibial ring. Overlap the hinge with the center of rotation of the ankle joint.
Step 3: Apply the foot frame to the hinges. Adjust the foot frame so that it is parallel to the plantar aspect of the foot. This can be done by placing a board on the plantar aspect of the foot and making sure the foot frame is parallel to the board. A distraction rod off two pivot points such as twisted plate is connected posteriorly in the central hole between the two hinges. Wing nuts are used to connect the posts at either end of the distraction rod. This allows quick application and removal. The patient can combine distraction with removal of the distraction rod for exercise and rehabilitation.

Treatment of Equinus Deformity
Unconstrained Method (Technique—Paley9)
The same tibial base of fixation is used for the unconstrained method as for constrained method, but the foot frame is much simpler. This consists of a half-ring suspended off three threaded rods that are locked by a nut at their proximal end. The maximum posterior tilt of these washers is 7.5°. The half-ring is locked in place at that angle. Two smooth wires are inserted through the heel and fixed and tensioned to the half-ring. Deformity correction is performed by distraction on all three rods in order to pull the heel distally. The reason for the posterior tilt of these rods is that the ankle capsule in equinus runs in a straight line from the back of the talus to the posterior lip of the tibia. When the foot is in the plantigrade position, the line of the ankle capsule is tilted 5–7° posteriorly. This is because the posterior lip of the talus protrudes posterior to that of the tibia. If the rods were not tilted back but were parallel to the tibia, distraction along, that line would pull the ankle capsule directly distally. This would force the talus forward, out of the mortise. When the rods are tilted posteriorly, the talus is pulled back into the mortise.

Varus Deformity: (Technique-Paley)9(Fig 6 A & B)
Heel varus deformity is corrected by the same type of construct as that used in an unconstrained correction of equinus deformity. The difference is that an olive is used on the medial side. The threaded rods are connected via hinges. The posterior threaded rods are connected to a two, three, or four-hole hinge so that the hinge point is proximal to the level of the heel wire. In this way, as the medial side is distracted, because it has to pivot around the hinge, it will translate laterally, forcing the heel out of varus. The rods medially and laterally are connected with a hinge distally and conical washers proximally, or with twisted plates that have pivot points at both ends, or with a mixture of the two. The choice depends on the degree of deformity. Conical washers can adapt only to a 7.5° tilt in either direction. The correction is produced by asymmetrical distraction of all three rods. The medial rod is lengthened at five 0.25 mm adjustments per day, the middle rod at three 0.25 mm adjustments per day, and the lateral rod at one 0.25 mm adjustment per day. In this manner, there is no risk of crushing of the joint surface.

Correction of Foot Deformity by Soft Tissue Distraction 10,11
The Standard Frame
The standard foot assembly consists of the tibial component, the calcaneal component and the forefoot component. The tibial assembly usually consists of two rings. When two rings are used, it becomes stronger support assembly. The level of its attachment depends on the size and complexity of the rest of the frame, the more complex the forefoot and hindfoot components, the higher the level of the supporting components is attached.
The calcaneal component consists of half-ring surrounding the heel. In most cases, both “legs” of this half-ring must be made longer by the firm attachment of the connecting plates. Two cross wires are inserted through the calcaneus and are connected to the half-ring. Only 50–60 kg tension is given. A half-pin passed in the calcaneus posteriorly adds to the stability. The forefoot ring consists of half-ring across the dorsum of the foot. Two wires are passed through the neck of the metatarsals. There are three ways to pass wires through the metatarsals: (1) usually the 1st and 5th matatarsals are used to keep the metatarsal arch, (2) the wires are passed through all the metatarsal pressing 2nd, 3rd, 4th metatarsals plantarwards, bringing all the metatarsals in one line. This gives better stability, and (3) wires are passed through 2nd or 3rd metatarsals and from lateral 5th, 4th or 3rd metatarsals. This is suggested by BB Joshi in JESS system. To do this the 1st and 5th metatarsals are squeezed, while the wire is being inserted. When the wire passes through the cortices of the first metatarsal, drilling is stopped as the wire comes out of the far cortex of the 1st metatarsal. The wire is tapped till it reaches the 5th metatarsal. Then again the wire is drilled through the 5th metatarsal neck as decided and is connected to the second or ring and tensed. Another wire may be passed through the 1st or 2nd metatarsal or through the 5th, 4th and 3rd metatarsals and connected to the ring. This wire maintains the metatarsal arch and gives more strength to the forefoot half-ring.
The forefoot and hindfoot components are connected to the tibial ring using hinges. In some cases, the forefoot component is connected to the calcaneal component by two long plates or threaded rods. The forefoot and hindfoot component may or may not be connected to each other depending on the situation. The connection between the forefoot and hindfoot assemblies is flexible in most cases by using hinges. In some cases, another wire is passed through the mid-tarsal bones, either through the cuboid and navicular or through the talar head. This wire is connected tibial to the distal ring by rods, alter natively this wire is connected to the posts on a plate which is connected to the forefoot half-ring, according to the situation.

Correction of Foot Deformities by Distraction of Osteotomy
Osteotomies around the foot and ankle for distraction are devised by Ilizarov12,13. Paley has classified Ilizarov osteotomies for foot correction into two groups, osteotomies along the long axis of tibia and those along the long axis of foot.
Osteotomies in the long axis of tibia are:
Supramalleolar at metaphysis
Supramalleolar juxta-articular
U-osteotomy through calcaneus and talar neck.
Osteotomies in the long axis of foot are:
V-osteotomy
Posterior calcaneal osteotomy
Talocalcaneal osteotomy
Through talonavicular and calcaneal cuboid joints
Through metatarsals.
Osteotomy in the long axis of tibia will correct all deformities except the deformities between the hind and forefoot such as cavus or the rocker bottom foot and cannot lengthen foot. Therefore, the anatomic relation of hindfoot and forefoot must be normal. Osteotomy in the long axis of foot corrects all deformities of the hind or forefoot, but will not correct deformity at ankle or above, and limb length discrepancy.
U-osteotomy is made through a lateral approach to the hindfoot. U-osteotomy starts behind the subtalar joint, passes under this joint through superior part of the calcaneus across the sinus tarsi and neck of the talus. This is specially indicated when there is a flat top talus or very long-standing equinus deformity. In this situation, the talus is incongruous in the ankle joint and will not enter the ankle mortise because the anterior broad end will not be accommodated in the joint. This osteotomy is able to correct equinus, calcaneus, varus, valgus, and foot height. It is unable to correct deformities between the hindfoot and forefoot like cavus and rocker bottom foot (Fig.7)

V-osteotomy (Fig.8 & 9)
V-osteotomy is a double osteotomy, one osteotomy across the body of the calcaneus posterior to the subtalar joint and one osteotomy across the neck of the talus. The V-osteotomy is used to correct the relation of the hindfoot, midfoot and forefoot, one to the other. The hindfoot with the tuberosity and the Achilles lies posteriorly and the midfoot and forefoot lies anteriorly. This permits angular and rotational correction of the anterior and posterior segments in relation to the middle segment, the leg, and the ground, i.e. varus, valgus, adduction, supination, and pronation.
The V-osteotomy is indicated when there are deformities between the hind and forefoot. A prerequisite for this osteotomy is stiff subtalar joint. Essentially, all foot deformities can be corrected through the V-osteotomy, including hindfoot and forefoot equinus or calcaneus, rocker bottom deformities, cavus deformities, abductus and adductus deformities, and even deformities of length and bony deficiencies of the hindfoot or forefoot.

Supramalleolar Osteotomy (Paley) (Fig.10)
Supramalleolar osteotomies can correct equinus, calcaneus, varus and valgus deformities. The relationship for the hindfoot to the forefoot must be normal if this is to be the sole treatment Indication.
Supramalleolar osteotomies are indicated in the following conditions: (1) Deformities of the metaphyseal and juxta-articular region of the distal tibia, (2) deformity at the ankle level. Ankle may have previous arthrodesis. Deformities at the talus or subtalar joint with ankylosis of the ankle joint. Equinus, calcaneus, varus, valgus, tibial torsion, and leg-length discrepancy can be corrected by this osteotomy.
Advantages
Rotational deformity of the tibia can be corrected.
If the tibia is short, it can be lengthened by distracting this osteotomy.
The supramalleolar osteotomy is technically the easiest of the Ilizarov foot osteotomies as this is a cancellous part.
The supramalleolar osteotomy is particularly useful in the multiply operated foot with poor skin, when the deformity is below the level of the ankle joint. One more advantage of the supramalleolar osteotomy is that is does not compromise motion in the hindfoot joints. It avoids operating on a multiply operated foot in cases where the deformity is below the level of the ankle joint deformity is below the level of the ankle joint.

Disadvantages
It cannot correct the deformity between the hindfoot and forefoot. The most common problem of this osteotomy is the translation of the distal fragment. This is because osteotomy is not done at the true apex of the deformity. This occurs when an angular deformity at one level is corrected at another level. For example, if a distal tibial deformity is at the level of the plafond (juxta-articular) rather than in the metaphysis, a metaphyseal osteotomy leads to a translational deformity. It is necessary to translate the metaphyseal osteotomy in addition to the angular correction.
Paley states that, it is preferable to use the supramalleolar osteotomy to correct only malalignment of the distal tibial articular surface. It can be used to correct deformities at the level of the talus when the ankle joint is very stiff. This leads to a tilt of the plafond that is insignificant when the ankle is very stiff. Because the apex of the deformity is distal to the osteotomy, the supramalleolar osteotomy must be translated, as mentioned previously.

Midfoot Osteotomy14 (Fig. 11 & 12)
Recently since year 2011 we have been doing midfoot and forefoot deformity correction by doing percutaneous midfoot osteotomy. This osteotomy is indicated for complex midfoot and forefoot deformities which are rigid. A percutaneous osteotomy is done at the level of cubid (midfoot). This osteotomy is a joint sparing osteotomy as it does not pass from any joint. A wedge is planned according to nature of deformity (varus /equines/cavus). A wedge is marked with help of 2 k-wires and osteotomy is done between them. After removing the wedge correction is almost complete. Remaining deformity can be corrected with regular non constrained Ilizarov frame. Lengthening of foot can also be achieved through same osteotomy. If the hind foot varus remains uncorrected then a calcaneus slide osteotomy is also added. This is rarely necessary. We find this joint spearing option easier and betterthan U or V osteotomy.

Conclusion
Deformity correction in cases of CTEV with ilizarov frame works well if principles of deformity correction are followed well. Dynamic deformity can be stretched out well with soft tissue distraction, while rigid deformity will require bony procedure. With advent of illizarov Painless, functional plantigrade foot can be achieved.

References

1. Paley D. Compensatory mechanisms and deformity. 2003. p. 596.
2. Paley D. Principles of deformity correction. In: Paley D (Ed). Springer; 2002. pp. 571-645.
3. Frant AD, Atar D, Lehman WB. Ilizarov technique in correction of foot deformities—a preliminary report. Foot and Ankle. 1990;11:1-5.
4. Paley D. The correction of complex foot deformities using Ilizarov’s distraction osteotomies. Clin Orthop. 1993;280.
5. Atar D, Lehman WB, Grant AD. Revision clubfoot surgery. In: Jahss M (Ed). Disorders of the Foot and Ankle. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1991. p. 40.
6. Caroll N. Clubfoot. In: Morrissy R (Ed). Lovell and Winter’s Pediatric Orthopaedics. Philadelphia: JB Lippinocott; 1990. pp. 927-56.
7. Ilizarov GA. Clinical application of the tension stress effect for the limb lengthening. Clin Orthop. 1990;250:8.
8. Paley D. Problems, obstacles and complications of limb lengthening by the Ilizarov technique. Clin Orthop. 1990;250:81-104.
9. Paley D. The Principles of deformity correction by the Ilizarov technique technical aspects. Tech Orthop. 1989;4:15-29.
10. Grill F, Franke JL. The Ilizarov distractor for the correction of relapsed or neglected clubfoot. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1987;69B:593.
11. Herold HZ, Torok G. Surgical correction of neglected clubfoot in the older child and adult. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973;55A:1385-95.
12. Ilizarov GA, Shevtosov VI. Treatment of Equino-excavato-varus deformation of the feet in the adults by the Ilizarov transosseous osteosynthesis. Methodological recommendation Book Jurgan Internal Publication, 1987.
13. Lehman WB, Grant AD, Atar D. The use of distraction osteogenesis (Ilizarov) in complex foot deformities. In: Jahss M (Ed). Disorder of the foot and ankle. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1991. pp. 2735-45.
14. Ruta M Kulkarni , Anurag Rathore , Rajeev Negandhi , Milind G Kulkarni , Sunil G Kulkarni , Arpit Sekhri. Treatment of Neglected and Relapsed Clubfoot with Midfoot Osteotomy: A Retrospective Study. International Journal of Paediatric Orthopaedics 2015 July-Sep;1(1):38-43.

How to Cite this Article:Kulkarni R, Negandhi R. Use of Ilizarov Technique in correction of complex Clubfoot. International Journal of Paediatric Orthopaedics Jan-April 2016;2(1):10-18.

Half Sized Blog Element (Single Author Style)

Half Sized Blog Element (Multi Author Style)

Dorso-Lateral Wedge correction osteotomy: Is this the way forward?

Use of Illizarov Technique in correction of complex Clubfoot

Dorso-Lateral Wedge correction osteotomy: Is this the way forward?

Use of Illizarov Technique in correction of complex Clubfoot

Full Sized Blog Element (Big Preview Pic)

Dorso-Lateral Wedge correction osteotomy: Is this the way forward?

Authors :Viraj U Shingade[1]

Abstract

References

(Abstract) (Full Text HTML) (Download PDF)

Use of Illizarov Technique in correction of complex Clubfoot

Authors :Ruta Kulkarni[1], Rajiv Negandhi[1]

Abstract

References

(Abstract) (Full Text HTML) (Download PDF)

License

Publisher